Efficacy of N, N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT) psychedelic therapy for substance misuse: A systematic review and meta-analysis
L. M. Wallace, Andrea Bujor, Gustavo Sudre, Mark Kennedy, Diana-elena Bahnareanu, Khushi Mittal
Journal of Psychopharmacology April 12, 2026 Peer reviewed DOI: 10.1177/02698811261430518 via OpenAlex
Summary
DMT has a large overall effect size of 0.94 for reducing substance abuse, with even greater efficacy for drug use (1.35) compared to alcohol use (0.65). Studies that included psychotherapy showed significantly better outcomes (1.38) than those without (0.60). However, the findings are based on studies with high risk of bias and methodological limitations, suggesting that results should be seen as preliminary. Future research is needed to confirm these findings.
Study at a glance
| Design | systematic review and meta-analysis |
|---|---|
| Population | DMT intervention studies from 1960 to 2024 |
| Key finding | DMT shows a large effect size for substance abuse reduction, particularly when combined with psychotherapy. |
Abstract
Background: Conventional psychological and pharmacological substance abuse treatments are limited to moderate effect sizes and fail to magnify outcomes when combined. Analog psychedelic agents N, N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT) and 5-methoxy-N, N-dimethyltryptamine (5-MeO-DMT) show therapeutic potential for treatment-resistant psychiatric disorders including substance addictions. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesized DMT intervention studies (1960–2024) across PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and EBSCO databases, calculating pooled effects for substance use reduction. Subgroup sensitivity analyses examined the impacts of psychotherapy, population type, and treatment design on outcomes. Results: DMT yielded a large overall effect size for substance abuse reduction ( g = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.56–1.31, p < 0.0001), with superior efficacy for drug use ( g = 1.35, 95% CI: 0.63–2.07, p < 0.0001) compared to alcohol use ( g = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.31–0.99, p < 0.0001). Studies incorporating psychotherapy showed significantly greater effects ( g = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.06–1.71, p < 0.0001) than those without ( g = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.09–1.12, p < 0.0001), with significant subgroup difference ( p = 0.0121). High risk of bias and high heterogeneity were observed ( I 2 = 96.9%), with effects varying by substance type and treatment context. No publication bias was detected. Conclusion: When combined, available studies demonstrate DMT’s potentially substantial post-treatment efficacy for substance misuse, particularly with psychotherapy. Effect magnitudes vary by abused substances. Included studies had substantial methodological limitations and high risk of bias. Reported effects should therefore be interpreted as preliminary rather than indicative of established efficacy. Furthermore, the use of exploratory subgroup analyses in this review can only conclude that DMT efficacy for treating alcohol and substance abuse disorders is highly heterogeneous, depending on study and treatment design. If sustained positive results are clearly demonstrated in future research, it might position DMT-assisted psychotherapy as an effective, economical alternative to conventional treatments.