Effect of Liner Properties on the Analysis of Lysergic Acid Diethylamide (LSD) Analogs
Summary
Liners with packing material in gas chromatography significantly increased the detection of LSD-related compounds compared to those without. While liner geometry had a minor impact, base deactivation consistently improved peak areas over time, maintaining stable responses across seventy samples. In contrast, liners with Topaz deactivation showed a marked decrease in response, dropping by 52% to 68% after the first injection and 30% to 54% by the final injection.
Study at a glance
| Sample size | 70 |
|---|---|
| Population | authentic samples of LSD-related compounds |
| Key finding | Liners with packing material led to significantly higher responses for LSD-related compounds than those without. |
Abstract
Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) and analogs are psychedelic drugs commonly submitted to forensic chemistry laboratories. These drugs are often present on items of evidence at low concentrations, requiring sensitive analyses to positively identify their presence. The injection port of a gas chromatograph (GC) plays an important role in vaporizing and transferring substances to the column for separation and subsequent detection. The consumables in the inlet, specifically the liner, can influence the abundance and chromatography of compounds being analyzed. Twelve liners with varying geometries, packing material, and deactivation chemistries were assessed by analyzing a mixture of eight LSD related compounds and comparing the average peak areas. Liners containing packing material led to significantly higher responses than those without. Liner geometry played a smaller role and affected results only with one deactivation when glass wool was not present. Base deactivation improved peak area when compared to standard and Topaz deactivation in straight liners with packing. Authentic samples were analyzed on liners with varying deactivation chemistries to determine the effect over a run of seventy samples. Response with base deactivated liners and liners with standard deactivation remained consistent over time, whereas the liner with Topaz deactivation decreased in response 52 % to 68 % after the initial injection and demonstrated a decrease in response of 30 % to 54 % from the first injection to the final injection.