Skip to content

Evaluating the abuse liability of ketamine in the treatment of mood disorders: A systematic review.

Shreya Vasudeva, Gabrielle F M Lovell, Sabrina Wong, Gia Han Le, Diana K Orsini, Sara Di Luch, Roger S McIntyre, Joshua D Rosenblat

Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) June 24, 2026 Peer reviewed DOI: 10.1177/02698811261453814 via PubMed

Summary

Ketamine and its enantiomer esketamine show low potential for abuse when administered in controlled clinical settings, with clinical studies indicating minimal evidence of craving or misuse. A systematic review of 30 studies found that while preclinical research suggests some reinforcing effects, these risks are largely associated with uncontrolled environments. The findings support the safe use of ketamine in treating mood disorders, highlighting the need for structured administration and ongoing monitoring.

Study at a glance

Design systematic review
Sample size 30
Population clinical and preclinical studies assessing ketamine or its enantiomers
Key finding Ketamine and esketamine carry low abuse liability when delivered in monitored clinical settings.

Abstract

Ketamine has emerged as a promising rapid-acting treatment for mood disorders and suicidality. Notwithstanding its replicated antidepressant efficacy, ketamine-associated risk for abuse, dependence, and misuse remain. We conducted a systematic review of clinical and preclinical studies from database inception to August 2025, including randomized and observational trials, open-label extensions, case reports, and preclinical animal research, assessing ketamine or its enantiomers for outcomes related to abuse potential including craving, drug liking, tolerance, withdrawal, or dependence. A total of 30 studies (25 clinical and 5 preclinical) met the inclusion criteria. Clinical studies consistently reported minimal evidence of craving, dose escalation, misuse, or illicit use when ketamine or esketamine was administered in controlled, clinically supervised settings. Preclinical findings demonstrated that (S)-ketamine produces reward-related behaviors and locomotor sensitization, racemic ketamine shows reinforcing effects at higher doses, whereas (R)-ketamine demonstrates minimal reinforcing effects. Overall, the body of reviewed literature suggests that ketamine and esketamine carry low abuse liability when delivered in a monitored clinical setting while risk of abuse and misuse was identified largely in case reports and series in which appropriate monitoring was often not conducted. These findings support the safe incorporation of ketamine into treatment protocols for mood disorders while emphasizing the importance of structured administration and ongoing patient monitoring both throughout treatment and follow-up. Further research using longitudinal, prospective designs is warranted to assess potential misuse over extended treatment periods and across diverse patient populations, to optimize clinical safety and further inform evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.

Tags

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment