Electroconvulsive Therapy and Ketamine Infusion in Patients with Bipolar I or II Depression: A Case Series.
Keming Gao, Evrim Bayrak Oruc, Heather Wobbe, Margret Musso, Buket Koparal
Psychopharmacology bulletin June 5, 2026 Peer reviewed DOI: 10.64719/pb.18534 via PubMed
Summary
In a small sample of six patients with bipolar depression, all received electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) first, with four showing significant improvement of at least 50% in depressive symptoms. Two of these patients also had similar improvement with ketamine infusion (KET-IFU), though the effects varied in onset. One patient did not respond to either treatment. No adverse events led to discontinuation of KET-IFU, indicating safety in this context.
Study at a glance
| Design | observational cohort |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 6 |
| Population | patients with bipolar I or II depression who received both ECT and KET-IFU treatments |
| Key finding | Most patients responded well to ECT, and half had similar benefits from KET-IFU. |
Abstract
To compare the efficacy and safety of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and ketamine infusion (KET-IFU) in routine care for patients with bipolar I or II depression (BPD). Electronic medical records of patients who received ECT and/or KET-IFU were used to identify patients with BPD who received both ECT and KET-IFU treatments. The change in the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (QIDS-16-SR) total score was used as an efficacy outcome. Self-reported side effects and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) were used as safety measures. Six patients with BPD received both ECT and KET-IFU treatments. All patients received ECT first. Five patients received KET-IFU due to subjective memory concerns from ECT although their MoCA scores were within normal range. One patient with multiple previous ECT series received two KET-IFU series followed by an ECT series. Four patients responded to acute ECT treatments well with ⩾ 50% improvement in QIDS-16-SR total scores. Two of them also responded to KET-IFU well with ⩾ 50% improvement but the onset of antidepressant effect differed. One patient did not respond to ECT or KET-IFU. The patient who had two series of KET-IFU responded well during the first KET-IFU series but had limited benefit from the second KET-IFU series. No patient discontinued KET-IFU due to an adverse event. Most patients responded to ECT well and half of them had similar benefit from KET-IFU as from ECT. Randomized, head-to-head comparison studies of ECT versus KET-IFU in BPD are warranted to confirm or refute these findings.