The Monoamine-Glutamate Continuum of Depression: A Neurobiological Framework for Precision Psychiatry.
Pietro Carmellini, Alessandro Cuomo, Maria Beatrice Rescalli, Mario Pinzi, Afendra Dourmas, Andrea Fagiolini
Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) April 24, 2026 Peer reviewed DOI: 10.3390/ph19050662 via PubMed
Summary
Major depressive disorder (MDD) shows significant biological variability that isn't captured by current diagnostic methods. This review integrates monoaminergic and glutamatergic perspectives, suggesting that depressive syndromes involve different contributions from these systems. Evidence highlights the role of rapid-acting antidepressants like ketamine in enhancing synaptic plasticity, leading to quicker symptom relief, especially in treatment-resistant cases. A combined approach using clinical and biological markers may improve precision psychiatry for MDD.
Study at a glance
| Design | narrative review |
|---|---|
| Key finding | Integrating monoaminergic and glutamatergic mechanisms offers a framework for understanding the heterogeneity of depression and treatment responses. |
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Major depressive disorder (MDD) remains a leading cause of disability worldwide and exhibits substantial biological heterogeneity that is not adequately captured by current symptom-based diagnostic systems. While the classical monoamine hypothesis has historically guided antidepressant development, it does not fully account for variability in treatment response, delayed therapeutic onset, or the persistence of cognitive and anhedonic symptoms. Converging evidence from molecular, neuroimaging, and translational studies increasingly implicates glutamatergic dysregulation and impaired neuroplasticity as key mechanisms in depressive pathology. This narrative review aims to integrate monoaminergic and glutamatergic perspectives within a dimensional framework that may help explain clinical heterogeneity and inform mechanism-based treatment strategies. Methods: A narrative synthesis of the literature was conducted using major biomedical databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Preclinical studies, neuroimaging investigations, biomarker research, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses examining monoaminergic dysfunction, glutamatergic signaling, neuroplasticity pathways, and rapid-acting antidepressants were reviewed and thematically integrated. Results: Evidence indicates that depressive syndromes may reflect varying contributions of monoaminergic dysregulation and glutamatergic-neuroplastic impairment. Monoaminergic disturbances interact with inflammatory and neuroendocrine processes, including cytokine-driven activation of the kynurenine pathway. In parallel, alterations in glutamatergic signaling, glial function, and BDNF-TrkB-mTOR pathways contribute to synaptic atrophy and network dysfunction. Rapid-acting antidepressants such as ketamine, esketamine, and dextromethorphan-bupropion provide clinical proof-of-concept that direct engagement of synaptic plasticity mechanisms can accelerate symptom improvement, particularly in treatment-resistant depression. Conclusions: Integrating monoaminergic and glutamatergic mechanisms within a "monoamine-glutamate continuum" offers a conceptual framework for understanding depressive heterogeneity and treatment response. Multimodal approaches combining clinical phenotyping with inflammatory, neuroimaging, and molecular markers may ultimately support mechanism-informed precision psychiatry strategies in major depressive disorder.