Re-evaluation of the discriminative stimulus effects of lysergic acid diethylamide with male and female Sprague-Dawley rats
Behavioural Pharmacology December 1, 2020 Peer reviewed DOI: 10.1097/fbp.0000000000000589
Summary
The study found that both male and female rats could discriminate between LSD and saline, with similar substitution effects for serotonergic hallucinogens. However, modest differences were noted in the response to certain substances between sexes. Dopamine antagonists did not block the LSD cue, while a specific serotonin antagonist blocked discrimination more effectively in males at lower doses. These findings highlight the importance of serotonergic mechanisms in LSD's effects and suggest further investigation into sex differences is needed.
Study at a glance
| Sample size | 16 |
|---|---|
| Population | adult male and female Sprague-Dawley rats |
| Key finding | LSD discrimination was comparable between sexes, but modest differences in response to some substances were observed. |
Abstract
Recent discoveries from clinical trials with psychedelic-assisted therapy have led to a resurgence of interest in the psychopharmacology of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD). Preclinical drug discrimination is an invaluable tool to investigate the neurochemical mechanisms underlying subjective drug effects. The current study extends previous drug discrimination research by including both sexes. Adult female (n = 8) and male (n = 8) Sprague-Dawley rats were trained to discriminate 0.08 mg/kg LSD from saline under a fixed ratio 20 schedule of food reinforcement. Substitution tests were conducted with several substances, including other serotonergic hallucinogens, psychostimulants, mixed psychedelic-stimulants and synthetic cathinones. Stimulus antagonist tests were conducted with selected serotonin and dopamine antagonists. LSD-substitution with serotonergic hallucinogens was comparable between sexes. Modest but intriguing differences were observed between male and female rats in the extent of partial substitution by 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine and 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine enantiomers and the synthetic cathinones, 3,4-methylenedioxypyrovalerone and 4-methylmethcathinone. Dopamine antagonists failed to block the LSD cue in both sexes and exerted stronger rate suppressant effects in male rats. The 5-hydroxytryptamine antagonist, (R)-(+)-a-(2,3-dimethoxyphenyl)-1-[2-(4-fluorophenyl) ethyl]-4-piperidinemethanol (MDL 100 907) blocked LSD discrimination in both sexes, although complete blockade was evident at lower doses in male rats. These results support previous findings regarding the prominent role of serotonergic activities underlying LSDs discriminative stimulus effects in male rats and generalize these findings to female rats. In consideration of the rising popularity in psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy, further research may be warranted to evaluate possible sex differences in the behavioral and subjective effects of LSD.