Skip to content

The Logical Origin of Consciousness

H.-k. Chan

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) June 22, 2026 Peer reviewed DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20791195 via OpenAlex

Summary

Consciousness is described as being thoroughly physical but also abstract, similar to how software relates to hardware. It arises from a specific pattern of physical processes in the brain that involves receiving data in parallel. This view clarifies that subjective experience is not an inexplicable phenomenon but rather a lawful pattern within physical reality. The paper connects this understanding to concepts like observation of past states and the differences between sequential processing and parallel integration.

Study at a glance

Key finding Consciousness is best understood as the software of the software of the brain, representing a lawful organizational pattern within physical reality.

Abstract

The philosophy of consciousness has long been trapped in a false dilemma: is it physical or non-physical? This paper proposes that a clear resolution is in plain sight. Consciousness is thoroughly physical, yet more than merely physical—it is also abstract in the precise sense that software is abstract with respect to hardware. Just as music is sound but more than mere sound, and an academic paper is more than letters on a page, consciousness is a higher-level pattern. The distinction between software and hardware is relative: when one thing is a pattern or configuration of another, we call the former the software of the latter (its hardware). An atom, for example, is the software of protons, neutrons, and electrons; a molecule is the software of atoms. The same layering applies at higher levels. Consciousness qualifies as physical because it stands in clear, predictable causal relations with the rest of the physical world. However, it is not merely the brain, nor just any physical process. It is a specific kind of pattern: Subjective experience (feeling) arises from receiving a large amount of data at once (in parallel, non-sequentially) by a meta-observing system. This formulation connects naturally to three key ideas: observation of one's own past states, the irreversible compression that arises from finite capacity (which helps explain qualia intensity), and the distinction between sequential processing (which produces no feeling) and massively parallel integration (which does). The physical processes of the brain are themselves patterns. Consciousness is therefore best understood as the software of the software of the brain—a pattern of physical processes of the brain. This perspective dissolves the hard problem by showing that subjective experience is neither an inexplicable extra nor a non-physical mystery, but a lawful, empirically investigable organizational pattern within physical reality.

Tags

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment