Skip to content

Double bookkeeping and schizophrenia spectrum: divided unified phenomenal consciousness.

Josef Parnas, Annick Urfer-parnas, Helene Stephensen

European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience December 1, 2021 Peer reviewed DOI: 10.1007/s00406-020-01185-0 via PubMed

Summary

The concept of 'double bookkeeping,' introduced by Eugen Bleuler, describes how psychotic patients navigate both a social world and a delusional one. This phenomenon has been largely overlooked in psychiatry but is evident across various psychotic conditions, including in premorbid phases and schizotypal disorder. A phenomenological analysis indicates that double bookkeeping reflects instability in self-affection. The article outlines four key implications: diagnostic, epistemological, therapeutic, and pathogenetic research.

Study at a glance

Population psychotic patients and individuals with schizotypal disorder
Key finding Double bookkeeping manifests across various psychotic phenomena and may be observed even before the onset of illness.

Abstract

Eugen Bleuler, the founder of the concept of schizophrenia, pointed out that psychotic patients were able to live in two disjoint worlds (namely, the social, intersubjective world and the delusional world). He termed this phenomenon "double bookkeeping," but did not provide any conceptual elaboration of this phenomenon or its possible mechanisms. Double bookkeeping has been neglected in mainstream psychiatry, but it has been addressed in recent theoretical work, however mainly concerned with the issue of delusion. In this article, we present clinical material that supports the view that double bookkeeping manifests itself across various psychotic phenomena and its antecedent may be observed in premorbid (pre-onset) phases as well as in the schizotypal disorder. We try to conceptualize double bookkeeping to concretize an often atmospheric perception of paradoxicality in the encounter with the patient. A phenomenological analysis of double bookkeeping suggests an instability in the affective ("auto-affection") articulation of selfhood. We point to four main implications of our presentation: (1) diagnostic, (2) epistemological, (3) therapeutic and (4) pathogenetic research.

Tags

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment