The relationship between awareness and attention: evidence from ERP responses.
Mika Koivisto, Pasi Kainulainen, Antti Revonsuo
Neuropsychologia November 1, 2009 Peer reviewed DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.06.016 via PubMed
Summary
The study reveals that spatial attention is essential for the earliest electrophysiological signals related to phenomenal consciousness, indicating that it is a prerequisite for internal representations of space. While this correlate of consciousness appears independently of nonspatial object selection, its later aspects are influenced by it. Additionally, access to reflective consciousness relies on both spatial attention and nonspatial selection, highlighting the need to differentiate between types of attention and forms of awareness.
Study at a glance
| Design | experimental study |
|---|---|
| Key finding | Spatial attention is a prerequisite for the earliest electrophysiological correlate of phenomenal consciousness. |
Abstract
The relationship between attention and awareness is complex, because both concepts can be understood in different ways. Here we review our recent series of experiments which have tracked the independent contributions of different types of visual attention and awareness to electrophysiological brain responses, and then we report a new experiment focusing on spatial attention, nonspatial selection of objects, and visual consciousness at the same time. The results indicate that the earliest electrophysiological correlate of consciousness, assumed to correlate with "phenomenal consciousness", was dependent on spatial attention, suggesting that spatial attention is a prerequisite for the internal representations of space that provide the medium for phenomenal experience. The correlate of phenomenal consciousness emerged independent of nonspatial selection of objects, but its later part was modified by it. By contrast, the correlate of access to later conscious processing stages ("reflective consciousness") that take the selected contents of phenomenal consciousness as input for conceptual thought and working memory, was dependent on both spatial attention and nonspatial selection. These results imply that one should distinguish between different types of attention and different forms of awareness, when describing the relationship between attention and awareness.