The study of mystical experiences and Latour’s ontological turn: toward a participatory approach

Summary

Latour’s concepts of actor-networks and modes of existence provide a framework for understanding mystical experiences (MEs) as participatory events rather than isolated inner experiences. This approach avoids assuming the existence or non-existence of an ontological referent for these experiences. The article reviews historical academic perspectives on MEs, critiques perennialism and constructivism, and elaborates on Latour's ideas, suggesting that a participatory approach can significantly enhance the study of MEs.

Study at a glance

Abstract

This article argues that Latour’s concepts of actor-networks and modes of existence make room for a different participatory approach to mystical experiences (MEs), as well as religious experience more broadly, that interprets them as participatory events rather than as the inner experiences of an isolated subject. This alternative Latourian approach to MEs neither assumes the a priori presence or absence of an ontological referent to those experiences, nor does it defer the ontological question. Section one gives a historical overview of the academic study of MEs, introducing the approaches of perennialism and constructivism. Section two lays out the various philosophical problems with both these approaches. Section three describes Latour’s notions of actor-networks and modes of existence. Two of his modes of existence, beings of transformation and beings of religion, will be further elucidated. The discussion will consider in which ways a participatory approach can make a difference in the academic study of MEs.

Tags