How Level is the 'Cognitive Playing Field'?
Joshua M. Martin, Philipp Sterzer
Philosophy and the Mind Sciences April 19, 2022 Peer reviewed DOI: 10.33735/phimisci.2022.9326 via OpenAlex
Summary
Psychedelics may enhance their therapeutic effects by changing self-related belief systems, influenced significantly by contextual factors such as mindset and environment. The commentary emphasizes that the context during the psychedelic experience shapes how users perceive alternate self-conceptions. A positive mindset and supportive setting are linked to better outcomes in mental wellbeing, suggesting that these elements play a crucial role in the effectiveness of psychedelic therapy.
Study at a glance
| Key finding | Contextual factors like mindset and environment are essential in shaping self-conceptions during psychedelic experiences. |
|---|
Abstract
In Philosophy of Psychedelics, Letheby provides a convincing basis for the idea that psychedelics primarily derive their therapeutic potential through mediating favourable changes to self-related belief systems. In this commentary, we take a closer look at the role that contextual factors (‘set’ and ‘setting’) play in Letheby’s two-factor account of psychedelic therapy. While Letheby acknowledges that psychedelic effects are highly context-dependent, the exact role that context plays in self-modelling during the acute experience is not entirely clear. We argue that context plays an essential role in shaping the ‘discovery’ of alternate self-conceptions during the acute experience. Specifically, users are more likely to experience alterations in self-conception that are consistent with context-dependent features, such as one’s prior mindset (‘set’) and aspects of the external environment (‘setting’). This is consistent with a REBUS model of psychedelic effects, where a corollary effect of relaxing high-level prior beliefs is that the system becomes increasingly sensitised to bottom-up information (‘prediction errors’) from lower-level intrinsic sources and the sensory periphery. Furthermore, it may explain why a positive well-intentioned state of mind and a supportive therapeutic environment are more likely to result in positive acute experiences and long-term improvements in mental wellbeing. We see this position as being largely compatible with Letheby’s proposal, but may shift some aspects of its emphasis and framing. In particular, it may conflict with Letheby’s notion that psychedelics lead to a ‘level cognitive playing field’, where self-related hypotheses are thought to be assigned more or less equal probability.