A Cross-Cultural Defense of the Epistemic Value of Mystical Experience

Summary

Sri Ramakrishna's mystical testimony and teachings support the idea that mystical experiences can be considered valid. The chapter discusses how his views enhance current debates about the legitimacy of such experiences, particularly in relation to the philosopher Robert Oakes's assertion that self-authenticating experiences of God exist. Additionally, it addresses objections to the argument from experience regarding the verifiability of claims and conflicting testimonies.

Study at a glance

Abstract

This chapter explores how Sri Ramakrishna’s mystical testimony and teachings enrich contemporary analytic debates about the epistemic value of mystical experience. These debates center on a key question: are we warranted in taking mystical experiences—either our own or those of others—to be veridical? After briefly delineating Sri Ramakrishna’s views on the scope of theological reason, Maharaj argues that Sri Ramakrishna’s mystical testimony lends strong support to the philosopher Robert Oakes’s position that self-authenticating experiences of God are possible. The remainder of the chapter focuses on the argument from experience, the argument that it is reasonable to infer God’s existence from the testimony of people claiming to have experienced Him. Maharaj draws on Sri Ramakrishna’s teachings and mystical testimony in order to bolster contemporary philosophical defenses of the argument from experience. He contends, moreover, that Sri Ramakrishna’s distinctive approach helps defuse two serious objections to the argument from experience: namely, lack of adequate cross-checkability and the conflicting claims objection.