Functional effects of synthetic cannabinoids versus Δ9 -THC in mice on body temperature, nociceptive threshold, anxiety, cognition, locomotor/exploratory parameters and depression.
Shaul Schreiber, Miaad Bader, Tatiana Lenchinski, Inbar Meningher, Vardit Rubovitch, Yiffat Katz, Etia Cohen, Yankel Gabet, Michal Rotenberg, Ehud Udi Wolf, Chaim G Pick
Addiction biology May 1, 2019 Peer reviewed DOI: 10.1111/adb.12606 via PubMed
Summary
All three synthetic cannabinoids (AB-FUBINACA, AB-CHMINACA, PB-22) and Δ9-THC caused hypothermia, but only Δ9-THC showed a clear pain-relieving effect. Both types of substances decreased anxiety levels and impaired spatial memory, while the synthetic cannabinoids reduced locomotor activity, which was not observed with Δ9-THC. Additionally, PB-22 increased depression-like behavior, whereas AB-FUBINACA had the opposite effect. These findings highlight the differing impacts of synthetic cannabinoids compared to Δ9-THC.
Study at a glance
| Population | adult ICR mice |
|---|---|
| Key finding | All synthetic cannabinoids and Δ9-THC caused hypothermia, but only Δ9-THC induced a clear antinociceptive effect. |
Abstract
Synthetic cannabinoids are psychoactive substances designed to mimic the euphorigenic effects of the natural cannabis. Novel unregulated compounds appear once older compounds become illegal. It has been previously reported that synthetic cannabinoids are different than Δ9 -tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9 -THC) as they have chemical structures unrelated to Δ9 -THC, different metabolism and, often, greater toxicity. This study aimed to investigate the effects of three novel synthetic cannabinoids and pure Δ9 -THC on body temperature, nociceptive threshold, anxiety, memory function, locomotor and exploratory parameters, and depression. We performed a battery of behavioural and motor tests starting 50 minutes post i.p. injection of each drug to adult ICR mice. The synthetic cannabinoids that were used are AB-FUBINACA, AB-CHMINACA and PB-22. All synthetic cannabinoids and Δ9 -THC caused hypothermia, but only Δ9 -THC induced a clear antinociceptive effect. All synthetic cannabinoids and Δ9 -THC caused decreased anxiety levels, spatial memory deficits and decreased exploratory behaviour as measured in the elevated plus maze, Y-maze and staircase paradigm, respectively. However, all synthetic cannabinoids but not Δ9 -THC demonstrated decreased locomotor activity in the staircase test. Moreover, only AB-FUBINACA and Δ9 -THC affected the gait balance and grip strength of the mice as was assessed by the latency time to fall from a rod. In the forced swimming test, PB-22 caused elevated depression-like behaviour while AB-FUBINACA induced a reversed effect. These results suggest varied effects among different synthetic cannabinoids and Δ9 -THC. Further studies are needed to characterize the overall effects and differences between these synthetic cannabinoids and Δ9 -THC.