Neural correlates of phenomenological attitude toward perceptual experience
Satoshi Nishida, Hiro Taiyo Hamada, Takuya Niikawa, Katsunori Miyahara
bioRxiv Preprint Server July 7, 2024 preprint DOI: 10.1101/2024.07.07.602347 via bioRxiv
Summary
The phenomenological attitude, a reflective stance focused on conscious experience itself rather than external objects, is linked to distinct neural activity. In a behavioral task, participants made fewer errors but responded more slowly when adopting this attitude. Brain imaging revealed that regions including premotor cortex and cerebellum showed reduced activation during the phenomenological attitude, suggesting suppression of action-related information. This provides initial evidence for the neural basis of this reflective state.
Study at a glance
| Design | observational cohort |
|---|---|
| Key finding | The phenomenological attitude is associated with slower reaction times, lower error rates, and reduced activation in premotor cortex, posterior parietal cortex, supplementary motor area, and cerebellum compared to the natural attitude. |
Abstract
Phenomenology is one of the most promising approaches to study conscious experience. It holds that a rigorous study of conscious experience requires a transition in the subject from the “natural attitude” (NA) to the “phenomenological attitude” (PA). NA describes our ordinary stance, in which our attention is directed at external objects and events. PA is a distinctive, reflective stance in which our attention is directed at our conscious experience itself. Despite its theoretical importance in philosophy and science of consciousness, the neural mechanisms underlying PA remain unknown. To clarify this point, we developed a novel behavioral task in which participants alternate between NA and PA in relation to their stimulus-evoked subjective experiences. Participants are presented with two sentences and requested to identify the one that best captures their experience. These sentences are designed to induce either NA or PA. We found that participants had lower error rates but slower reaction times in the PA condition compared to the NA condition, suggesting a difference beyond task difficulty. Using fMRI, we also found that multivoxel activation patterns in the premotor cortex, posterior parietal cortex, supplementary motor area, and cerebellum successfully classified the task conditions. Furthermore, the activation strength in these regions was lower in the PA condition, indicating that PA depends on neural processes that suppress action-related information. These findings provide the first evidence for the neural signature of PA, contributing to a better understanding of phenomenological method and its underlying neural mechanisms.