Skip to content

An Encounter Between Theology and Shamanism

Kai Ngu

Indonesian Journal of Theology December 25, 2025 Peer reviewed DOI: 10.46567/ijt.v13i2.661 via Semantic Scholar

Summary

An anthropologist examines theologian Jojo M. Fung's books on sacred sustainability and shamanic pneumatology, which connect the Creative Spirit in Genesis to spirits of nature in indigenous religions. The author argues that Fung's engagement with indigenous communities in Southeast Asia reveals secular assumptions in anthropology's 'more-than-human' turn and its continued ties to the human. The author also suggests that theologians can benefit from anthropology's epistemic tools to recognize how interpretive lenses shape perceptions of others, sharpening both disciplines' aims.

Study at a glance

Design theoretical or philosophical paper
Key finding Fung's theological work with indigenous communities reveals secular assumptions in anthropology's 'more-than-human' turn and its persistent ties to the human, while theologians can benefit from anthropology's tools for recognizing interpretive biases.

Abstract

Inspired by Joel Robbins’s call for theology and anthropology to collaborate as theoretical partners, in this article, I examine the theologian Jojo M. Fung’s recent books, Sacred Sustainability, Polyhedral Christianity and Cosmic Challenges (2025) and A Shamanic Pneumatology in a Mystical Age of Sacred Sustainability (2017) from the point of view of an anthropologist. In these books, Fung builds a theoretical bridge to connect the Creative Spirit in the creation narratives of Genesis to spirits of nature in indigenous religious practices, in what he calls “creational pneumatology.” I argue that Fung’s theological engagement with indigenous religious communities in Southeast Asia illuminates the secular assumptions of the “more-than-human” turn in anthropology and beyond, and how such a turn remains inextricably tied to the “human” even in attempts to exceed it. Yet, I also point out that theologians like Fung can benefit from anthropology’s epistemic tools in explicitly highlighting how one’s interpretive lens colors one’s perception of the Other. Orchestrating this interdisciplinary dialogue between theology and anthropology illuminates the premises and assumptions embedded in each discipline, which will ultimately sharpen their respective aims.

Tags

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment