Schizophrenia or Possession? A Reply to Kemal Irmak and Nuray Karanci.
Journal of religion and health October 1, 2015 Peer reviewed DOI: 10.1007/s10943-015-0027-4 via PubMed
Summary
A critique of viewing some schizophrenia cases as demon possession is needed, but an alternative basis for that critique is proposed. The paper reflects on differences between demonic and other spirit possession and considers implications for mental healthcare providers.
Study at a glance
| Design | theoretical or philosophical paper |
|---|---|
| Key finding | A critique of demon possession beliefs in the context of schizophrenia is needed, but an alternative basis for it is suggested. |
Abstract
A recent paper in this journal argues that some cases of schizophrenia should be seen as cases of demon possession and treated by faith healers. A reply, also published in this journal, responds by raising concerns about the intellectual credibility and potentially harmful practical implications of demon possession beliefs. My paper contributes to the discussion, arguing that a critique of demon possession beliefs in the context of schizophrenia is needed, but suggesting an alternative basis for it. It also reflects on important differences between demonic and other forms of spirit possession and considers the implications of this for mental healthcare providers.