The Dialectics of Free Energy Minimization.
Evert A Boonstra, Heleen A Slagter
Frontiers in systems neuroscience January 1, 2019 Peer reviewed DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2019.00042 via PubMed
Summary
This article argues that Karl Friston's free energy minimization principle, a unifying theory of the brain and living systems, aligns with Georg Hegel's dialectics. Drawing on Catherine Malabou's work, the authors contend that Friston's framework reinvigorates Hegelian philosophy from a neuroscience perspective. They propose that the tension between cognitivism and enactivism—whether the organism is secluded or open—is a contradiction the organism sustains internally. This contradiction, where secluded existence depends on relation and vice versa, grounds the perpetual process of free energy minimization, moving the debate beyond either position.
Study at a glance
| Design | theoretical or philosophical paper |
|---|---|
| Key finding | Friston's free energy minimization implicitly aligns with Hegelian dialectics, revealing a contradiction between organismic seclusion and openness that grounds the minimization process. |
Abstract
Karl Friston's free energy minimization has been received with great enthusiasm. With good reason: it not only makes the bold claim to a unifying theory of the brain, but it is presented as an a priori principle applicable to living systems in general. In this article, we set out to show how the breadth of scope of Friston's framework converges with the dialectics of Georg Hegel. Through an appeal to the work of Catherine Malabou, we aim to demonstrate how Friston not only reinvigorates Hegelian dialectics from the perspective of neuroscience, but that the implicit alignment with Hegel necessitates a reading of free energy minimization from the perspective of Hegel's speculative philosophy. It is this reading that moves beyond the discussion between cognitivism and enactivism surrounding Friston's framework; beyond the question whether the organism is a secluded entity separated from its surroundings, or whether it is a dynamical system characterized by perpetual openness and mutual exchange. From a Hegelian perspective, it is the tension between both positions itself that is operative at the level of the organism; as a contradiction the organism sustains over the course of its life. Not only does the organism's secluded existence depend on a perpetual relation with its surroundings, but the condition for there to be such a relation is the existence of a secluded entity. We intend to show how this contradiction-tension internalized-is at the center of Friston's anticipatory organism; how it is this contradiction that grounds the perpetual process of free energy minimization.