REC: Just Radical Enough
Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric August 26, 2015 Peer reviewed DOI: 10.1515/slgr-2015-0020 via DOAJ
Summary
Radical embodied/enactive cognition (REC) is neither too radical nor insufficiently radical; it is just radical enough. The paper defends REC against common criticisms by arguing that its rejection of representational content in perception and language is appropriately calibrated.
Study at a glance
| Design | theoretical or philosophical paper |
|---|---|
| Key finding | Radical embodied/enactive cognition is just radical enough, contrary to claims that it is too radical or not radical enough. |
Abstract
We address some frequently encountered criticisms of Radical Embodied/Enactive Cognition. Contrary to the claims that the position is too radical, or not sufficiently so, we claim REC is just radical enough.