Embodying cognitive ethology.
Helen L Ma, Michael R W Dawson, Ruby S Prinsen, Dana A Hayward
Theory & psychology February 1, 2023 Peer reviewed DOI: 10.1177/09593543221126165 via PubMed
Summary
Cognitive psychology traditionally treats the environment as a source of information that does not alter basic cognitive processes, relying on controlled lab experiments with precise stimuli. A newer approach, cognitive ethology, aims to improve ecological validity by first observing robust real-world phenomena and then testing them in the lab, drawing on embodied (4E) cognition for its emphasis on agent-environment relationships.
Study at a glance
| Design | theoretical or philosophical paper |
|---|---|
| Key finding | Cognitive ethology should align with the ontology of less radical embodied cognition to gain epistemological insights, such as comparing real-world and lab studies to understand environmental dependence of cognition. |
Abstract
Cognitive psychology considers the environment as providing information, not affecting fundamental information processes. Thus, cognitive psychology's traditional paradigms study responses to precisely timed stimuli in controlled environments. However, new research demonstrates the environment does influence cognitive processes and offers cognitive psychology new methods. The authors examine one such proposal: cognitive ethology. Cognitive ethology improves cognitive psychology's ecological validity through first drawing inspiration from robust phenomena in the real world, then moving into the lab to test those phenomena. To support such methods, cognitive ethologists appeal to embodied cognition, or 4E cognition, for its rich relationships between agents and environments. However, the authors note while cognitive ethology focuses on new methods (epistemology) inspired by embodied cognition, it preserves most traditional assumptions about cognitive processes (ontology). But embodied cognition-particularly its radical variants-also provides strong ontological challenges to cognitive psychology, which work against cognitive ethology. The authors argue cognitive ethology should align with the ontology of less radical embodied cognition, which produces epistemological implications, offering alternative methodologies. For example, cognitive ethology can explore differences between real-world and lab studies to fully understand how cognition depends on environments.