Skip to content

4E Cognition and the Humanities

Amy Cook

The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition October 9, 2018 Peer reviewed DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198735410.013.47

Summary

Engaging with arts and humanities literally changes how we think, not just metaphorically. This chapter reviews cognitive science research intersecting with theater and literature, describing a theatrical experience that challenged traditional cognition theories. If thinking is "world-making" rather than processing stimuli, then literary scholarship must adapt. Interaction with art can be aesthetic, poetic, and autopoetic, suggesting new language for understanding 4E cognition (embodied, embedded, enactive, extended).

Study at a glance

Design review
Key finding Contemporary art, literature, and performance may offer new language and perspectives for understanding 4E cognition.

Abstract

Abstract The arts and humanities move us and change our minds—not just metaphorically but literally. This chapter provides a snapshot of some of the work that has occurred at the intersection of cognitive science and theater and literature. I provide a description and analysis of a theatrical experience that staged a challenge to traditional theories of cognition, demonstrating how artists are responding to and prodding work being done across the disciplines. If thinking is “world-making,” rather than processing stimuli into meaning, then the hermeneutic tradition of literary and art scholarship must adapt. If thinking means using objects in our environment in order to make changes to our own extended ecosystem, then an interaction with a work of art can be aesthetic, poetic, and autopoetic. Contemporary art, literature, and performance may suggest a new language—and a richer perspective on old language—for 4E cognition.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment