The Machine behind the Stage: A Neurobiological Approach toward Theoretical Issues of Sensory Perception.
Frontiers in psychology January 1, 2016 Peer reviewed DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01357 via PubMed
Summary
Perception arises from brain activation patterns, and all perceptual experiences—whether veridical, illusory, or hallucinatory—share this common neural cause. What distinguishes them is the external cause of the activation, not the experience itself. Separating the perceptual event from its hypothetical content, as everyday language does, creates unnecessary ontological complications. A clear distinction is drawn between physical properties of the real world (e.g., wavelength reflectance) and psychological properties of perceptual experiences (e.g., color). Perception is a cognitive process that should remain neutral regarding the truth of the knowledge it provides.
Study at a glance
| Design | theoretical or philosophical paper |
|---|---|
| Key finding | All perceptual experiences share a common neural cause, and perception should be considered a cognitive process separate from the truth of the knowledge acquired. |
Abstract
The purpose of the present article is to try and give a brief, scientific perspective on several issues raised in the Philosophy of Perception literature. This perspective gives a central role to the brain mechanisms that underlie perception: a percept is something that emerges when the brain is activated in a certain way and thus all perceptual experiences (whether veridical, illusory, or hallucinatory) have a common cause behind them, namely a given brain-activation pattern. What distinguishes between different cases of perception is what has caused this activation pattern, i.e., something very separate and very different from the perceptual experience itself. It is argued that separating the perceptual event from its hypothetical content, a direct consequence of the way everyday language is structured, creates unnecessary ontological complications regarding the nature of the hypothetical 'object' of perception. A clear distinction between the physical properties of the real world on the one hand (e.g., wavelength reflectance), and the psychological properties of perceptual experiences on the other (e.g., color) is clearly made. Finally, although perception is a way of acquiring knowledge/information about the world, this acquisition should be considered as a cognitive process which is separate to and follows perception. Therefore, the latter should remain neutral with respect to the 'correctness' or 'truth' of the knowledge acquired.