The effects of orally ingested Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol on drivers' hazard perception and risk-taking behaviours: A within-subjects study of medicinal cannabis users.
Taren Mieran, Andrew Hill, Mark S Horswill, Mathew J Summers, Kayla B Stefanidis
Psychopharmacology March 1, 2026 DOI: 10.1007/s00213-025-06869-w via PubMed
Summary
Medicinal cannabis users who consumed THC oil did not show a decline in their actual ability to detect hazards while driving, but their confidence in that ability dropped. There was no link between how well they thought they performed and how well they actually performed, regardless of THC consumption. After taking THC, users drove slower and kept longer following distances, suggesting they compensated for perceived impairment. Gap acceptance and self-rated driving skills remained unchanged. The findings indicate that frequent medicinal cannabis users may not accurately judge their own hazard perception performance, yet they adopt cautious driving behaviors after THC use.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Within-subjects design Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 41 |
| Population | Medicinal cannabis users |
| Topics | Cannabis |
| Keywords | Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol Hazard perception skill Road safety |
| Key finding | Orally ingested THC did not impair actual hazard perception skill in medicinal cannabis users, but they drove slower and followed at longer distances after consumption. |
Abstract
Medicinal cannabis use is increasing worldwide, yet its impacts on driving safety in frequent users are not clearly understood. A more comprehensive understanding of the effects of THC on driving behaviour in frequent users is needed to guide drug driving policy and evidence-based advice for medicinal cannabis consumers. This study investigated the acute effects of orally ingested THC oil on medicinal cannabis users': (a) hazard perception skill performance; (b) driving-related risk-taking behaviours (speeding propensity, following distance, gap acceptance); (c) self-perceived hazard perception skill performance; and (d) self-perceptions of driving skills and safety. A within-subjects design was used to compare scores on validated video-based measures of hazard perception skill and risk-taking behaviours, along with self-report measures, between baseline (no THC) and post-consumption. Although participants' (N = 41) actual hazard perception skill performance did not significantly decline from baseline to post-consumption, their perceived performance did (with no significant correlation between the two in either condition). In the other video-based measures, participants selected significantly slower speeds and longer following distances post-consumption (but gap acceptance behaviour was unchanged). There was no significant change in self-perceptions of driving skills and safety after correction for multiple tests. While there was no evidence that oral ingestion of THC oils by medicinal cannabis users impacted hazard perception skill performance, they were unable to accurately self-assess their performance, regardless of whether they had consumed THC. Further, medicinal cannabis patients engage in compensatory strategies, specifically by reducing their speed and increasing their following distance following the consumption of THC.