Biological Complexity and Cognitive Evolution
Peter Jedlicka, Jaroslav Varchola, Jakub Betinsky
Biological Theory March 30, 2026 DOI: 10.1007/s13752-026-00532-z via OpenAlex
Summary
Biological evolution appears to increase complexity, but defining complexity is difficult. Measures that assign low complexity to both highly ordered and highly random systems and high complexity to intermediate systems show that most biological systems fall in this range. These measures quantify the information an organism stores about its environment, supporting the idea that evolution increases the knowledge organisms accumulate about their niche. This aligns with cognitive biology, which views evolution as a progressive accumulation of knowledge or epistemic complexity, resembling a cognitive ratchet pushing toward higher complexity. A dynamic environment creates problems to be solved, and each solution becomes embodied knowledge. The framework also links to integrated information theory, suggesting that human self-reflection marks a new qualitative level in epistemic complexity.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Qualitative Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Organism Philosophy of biology Cognitive complexity Embodied cognition Information theory |
| Key finding | Evolution can be understood as a progressive accumulation of knowledge or epistemic complexity, with measures of biological complexity supporting this view by quantifying information organisms store about their environment. |
Abstract
Abstract Our intuition suggests a trend in biological evolution toward greater complexity. However, defining complexity is challenging. Here, we explore measures of biological complexity that assign low complexity to both highly ordered and highly random systems and high complexity to those in between. Most biological systems are highly complex, falling within this intermediate range, displaying both order and variability. Complexity measures quantify the information an organism stores in its genome or nervous system about its environment. Thereby, they support the idea that evolution increases the “knowledge” an organism accumulates about its niche. This is in line with the conceptual framework of cognitive biology, which views evolution as a progressive accumulation of knowledge or as an increase in epistemic complexity. In this view, evolution resembles a cognitive “ratchet” that pushes the organisms unidirectionally towards higher complexity. A dynamic environment continually creates problems to be solved. To survive means to solve problems posed by the environment, and each solution becomes embodied knowledge. Cognitive biology is closely related to the current measures of biological complexity because it uses concepts of information and entropy from information theory and thermodynamics. We also discuss the link between cognitive biology and complexity measures based on integrated information theory (IIT). When considering humans as conscious beings, it seems necessary to postulate the emergence of a new kind of knowledge—self-aware, self-referential knowledge. The appearance of self-reflection in evolution indicates that the human brain and cognition have reached a new qualitative level in epistemic complexity. In summary, cognitive biology, complemented by complexity measures, offers a unified framework for studying the evolution of biological complexity.