New Psychoactive Substances 3-Methoxyphencyclidine (3-MeO-PCP) and 3-Methoxyrolicyclidine (3-MeO-PCPy): Metabolic Fate Elucidated with Rat Urine and Human Liver Preparations and their Detectability in Urine by GC-MS, “LC-(High Resolution)-MSn” and “LC-(High Resolution)-MS/MS”
Julian A. Michely, Sascha K. Manier, Achim T. Caspar, Simon D. Brandt, Jason Wallach, Hans H. Maurer
Current Neuropharmacology November 3, 2016 DOI: 10.2174/1570159x14666161018151716 via OpenAlex
Summary
Two new psychoactive substances, 3-MeO-PCP and 3-MeOPCPy, are metabolized in rat and human liver microsomes through multiple pathways including hydroxylation, O-demethylation, and glucuronidation. Specific cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYP 2B6, 2C19, 2C9, 2D6) catalyze initial metabolic steps. Because only polymorphically expressed enzymes are involved, pharmacogenomic variations may affect metabolism, though clinical data are needed to confirm relevance. Standard urine screening approaches using GC-MS, LC-MSn, and LC-HR-MS/MS can detect intake of both drugs via identified metabolites.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Experimental study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Population | Rat and pooled human liver microsomes |
| Interventions | 3-Methoxyphencyclidine (3-MeO-PCP) 3-methoxyrolicyclidine (3-MeOPCPy) |
| Keywords | Urine Designer drug Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry Microsome |
| Citations | 36 |
| Key finding | Both 3-MeO-PCP and 3-MeOPCPy undergo multiple metabolic pathways, with specific CYP enzymes involved, and standard urine screening can detect their intake. |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: 3-Methoxyphencyclidine (3-MeO-PCP) and 3-methoxyrolicyclidine (3-MeOPCPy) are two new psychoactive substances (NPS). The aims of the present study were the elucidation of their metabolic fate in rat and pooled human liver microsomes (pHLM), the identification of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzymes involved, and the detectability using standard urine screening approaches (SUSA) after intake of common users' doses using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), liquid chromatography-multi-stage mass spectrometry (LC-MSn), and liquid chromatography-high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry (LC-HR-MS/MS). METHODS: For metabolism studies, rat urine samples were treated by solid phase extraction or simple precipitation with or without previous enzymatic conjugate cleavage. After analyses via LC-HR-MSn, the phase I and II metabolites were identified. RESULTS: Both drugs showed multiple aliphatic hydroxylations at the cyclohexyl ring and the heterocyclic ring, single aromatic hydroxylation, carboxylation after ring opening, O-demethylation, and glucuronidation. The transferability from rat to human was investigated by pHLM incubations, where Odemethylation and hydroxylation were observed. The involvement of the individual CYP enzymes in the initial metabolic steps was investigated after single CYP incubations. For 3-MeO-PCP, CYP 2B6 was responsible for aliphatic hydroxylations and CYP 2C19 and CYP 2D6 for O-demethylation. For 3-MeO-PCPy, aliphatic hydroxylation was again catalyzed by CYP 2B6 and O-demethylation by CYP 2C9 and CYP 2D6 Conclusions: As only polymorphically expressed enzymes were involved, pharmacogenomic variations might occur, but clinical data are needed to confirm the relevance. The detectability studies showed that the authors' SUSAs were suitable for monitoring the intake of both drugs using the identified metabolites.