Skip to content

On quantum theories of the mind

Henry P. Stapp

arXiv Preprint Archive November 26, 1997 via arXiv

Summary

The author responds to arguments that nonlinear classical mechanics, rather than quantum mechanics, provides the physical basis for consciousness. The reply defends the relevance of quantum mechanics to theories of mind by countering claims that classical nonlinear dynamics better explains conscious phenomena.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Quant-ph Consciousness Quantum-mechanics Neuroscience Mind-theory
Key finding Quantum mechanics remains a viable framework for understanding the physical underpinnings of consciousness, contrary to arguments favoring nonlinear classical mechanics.

Abstract

Replies are given to arguments advanced in this journal that claim to show that it is to nonlinear classical mechanics rather than quantum mechanics that one must look for the physical underpinnings of consciousness.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment