Skip to content

Randomized Controlled Trials of Psilocybin‐Assisted Therapy in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Vikas Menon, Parthasarathy Ramamurthy, Sandesh Venu, Chittaranjan Andrade

Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica December 3, 2024 DOI: 10.1111/acps.13778

Summary

Patients with major depressive disorder receiving psilocybin-assisted therapy were over three times more likely to achieve remission (relative risk = 3.66) within a week. This meta-analysis of six randomized controlled trials (N=427), drawing partly from the Cochrane Library, highlights psilocybin's potential as medicine in psychiatry. This chemical synthesis and alkaloid influences neurotransmitter receptor activity, showing significant promise in Psychedelics and Drug Studies. However, a 20% increased relative risk of any adverse effect (RR=1.20) was noted. This finding is crucial for internal medicine.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction There is growing interest in the use of psychedelic‐assisted therapy (PAT) for major depressive disorder (MDD), including treatment‐resistant depression. We used randomized controlled trial (RCT) data to compare summary estimates of change in depression ratings with PAT versus comparator treatments in MDD. We also compared response and remission rates, and adverse effects. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and SCOPUS from inception till April 2024. Our primary efficacy outcome was 1‐week (or nearest) between‐group change in depression ratings. Secondary efficacy outcomes were changes in depression ratings at days 2, 14, and 42 (or nearest) and study‐defined response and remission rates at week 1 (or nearest). Safety outcomes were reported adverse effects. We pooled outcomes in random‐effects meta‐analyses using standardized mean difference (SMD; Hedges g ) for continuous outcomes and risk ratio (RR) for categorical outcomes. Results We found 6 eligible RCTs (pooled N = 427), all on psilocybin. The pooled SMD for 1‐week between‐group change in depression ratings was −0.72 [95% CI, −0.95 to −0.49; I 2 = 17%; 5 RCTs; n = 403], favouring PAT; results were similar at days 2, 14, and 42. The response [RR = 3.42; 95% CI, 2.35–4.97; I 2 = 0%; 4 RCTs; n = 373] and remission [RR = 3.66; 95% CI, 2.26–5.92; I 2 = 0%; 4 RCTs; n = 373] rates also favored PAT. The PAT group had a small but significantly increased risk of developing any adverse event [RR = 1.20; 95% CI, 1.01–1.42; I 2 = 43%; 4 RCTs; n = 373] and a significantly higher risk of experiencing headache [RR = 1.78; 95% CI, 1.10–2.86; I 2 = 52%; 4 RCTs; n = 373] and dizziness [RR = 6.52; 95% CI, 1.19–35.87; I 2 = 0%; 3 RCTs; n = 269]. Low heterogeneity characterized most analyses and findings were similar in sensitivity analyses. Conclusion Antidepressant effects of psilocybin‐assisted therapy are superior (with at least medium effect sizes) to comparator interventions for at least up to 6 weeks postintervention.

Tags

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment