Skip to content

Jacob Vaughn

Department of Psychological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.

2 papers in the library · 8 citations · publishing 2025-2026

Papers

Incremental efficacy systematic review and meta-analysis of psilocybin-for-depression RCTs

Psychopharmacology April 23, 2025 Nicholas C Borgogna, Tyler Owen, Dan Petrovitch et al. 8 citations

Psilocybin moderately reduces depression compared to controls, with a standardized mean difference of 0.62, but effects vary widely across studies and are weaker in larger, better-controlled trials. Most of the nine randomized controlled trials (602 participants, 56% receiving psilocybin) had high risk of bias and poor harm reporting; only two studies had high-quality harm reporting. Therapeutic mechanisms of action were discussed but rarely tested, leaving it unclear how psilocybin alleviates depression. Smaller studies showed stronger effects favoring psilocybin, and nearly all studies reported financial conflicts of interest. Independent, larger trials with active controls and mechanism assessments are needed.

MDMA-Assisted Therapy Randomized Controlled Trial Incremental Effects Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

medRxiv Preprint Server May 5, 2026 Nicholas C. Borgogna, D. Drew Whittington, Tyler Owen et al. preprint

MDMA-assisted therapy (MDMA-AT) shows a moderate-to-large reduction in psychological symptoms compared to control conditions, based on a meta-analysis of eight controlled trials with 295 participants. The effect was larger against inert placebos than active controls. Trauma symptoms improved strongly, while depression showed a smaller, non-significant effect. Only 23% of publications met high-quality standards for reporting harms. Small samples and mediocre harm reporting underscore the need for larger, more transparent trials.