Skip to content

Sagar V. Parikh

4 papers in the library · 193 citations · publishing 2020-2026

Papers

The Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) Task Force Recommendations for the Use of Racemic Ketamine in Adults with Major Depressive Disorder: Recommandations Du Groupe De Travail Du Réseau Canadien Pour Les Traitements De L’humeur Et De L’anxiété (Canmat) Concernant L’utilisation De La Kétamine Racémique Chez Les Adultes Souffrant De Trouble Dépressif Majeur

The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry November 11, 2020 Jennifer Swainson, Alexander McGirr, Pierre Blier et al. 109 citations

A systematic review by the Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments evaluated evidence for racemic ketamine in treatment-resistant depression. Single intravenous infusions have Level 1 evidence for efficacy in adults, while multiple or maintenance infusions have only Level 3 evidence. Adverse events include dissociative symptoms and hypertension. Non-IV formulations have Level 3 or 4 evidence. Single-dose IV racemic ketamine is a third-line recommendation; repeated use requires careful case-by-case risk-benefit assessment. Oral and other formulations should be limited to specialists with ketamine expertise at tertiary centers due to limited evidence and risk of misuse.

The Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) Task Force Report: Serotonergic Psychedelic Treatments for Major Depressive Disorder

The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry August 17, 2022 Joshua D. Rosenblat, Muhammad Ishrat Husain, Yena Lee et al. 58 citations

Serotonergic psychedelics are being reconsidered as potential treatments for major depressive disorder. A Canadian task force systematically reviewed clinical trials from 1990 to 2021 and found that only psilocybin and ayahuasca have been tested in contemporary studies. Two pilot studies of single-dose ayahuasca for treatment-resistant depression showed preliminary positive effects (Level 3 evidence). Small randomized controlled trials of psilocybin combined with psychotherapy for major depressive disorder showed superiority to waitlist controls and comparable efficacy and safety to escitalopram with supportive psychotherapy, with additional trials showing efficacy in cancer-related depression (Level 3 evidence).

Effects of somatic treatments on suicidal ideation and completed suicides

Brain and Behavior November 25, 2021 Elise M Hawkins, William Coryell, Stephen Leung et al. 25 citations

Lithium and clozapine are the only two somatic treatments with high-quality evidence of reducing suicide risk, in mood disorders and schizophrenia respectively; stopping lithium increases that risk. Ketamine and esketamine may offer a small, immediate antisuicide effect, though a disproportionate number of suicides occurred in esketamine-treated subjects versus placebo (3 vs. 0 among over 3500 subjects), requiring ongoing evaluation. The evidence for electroconvulsive therapy's antisuicide effect is low-quality. Antidepressants' effect is unclear: direct evidence shows they may increase suicidal ideation and risk in young people over the short term, while indirect evidence suggests they reduce risk over the long term. Clinicians have an expanding pharmacopeia, but some agents may also increase suicidality under specific circumstances.

Non-inferiority, comparative effectiveness study of intravenous ketamine v. intranasal esketamine for treatment-resistant depression: The EQUIVALENCE trial protocol.

Contemp Clin Trials March 2, 2026 Samuel T. Wilkinson, Sandhya Prashad, Rachel Dalthorp et al. 1 citation

The EQUIVALENCE trial protocol describes a non-inferiority, comparative effectiveness study designed to test whether intranasal esketamine is no less effective than intravenous ketamine for treating treatment-resistant depression. The study will compare the two treatments head-to-head in patients who have not responded to prior antidepressant therapies. The protocol outlines the trial's design, including randomization, dosing regimens, outcome measures, and statistical analysis plan. By directly comparing these two forms of ketamine, the trial aims to provide evidence on whether the more convenient intranasal route can match the efficacy of the intravenous formulation, potentially offering a more accessible treatment option.