Nature medicine
July 1, 2024
Paul Glue, Colleen Loo, Johnson Fam et al.
60 citations
An extended-release oral tablet form of ketamine (R-107) was effective, safe, and well tolerated for treatment-resistant depression. In a phase 2 trial, 231 adults with severe depression took 120 mg of R-107 daily for 5 days; 168 who responded were then randomly assigned to receive 30, 60, 120, or 180 mg of R-107 or placebo twice weekly for 12 weeks. The 180 mg dose produced a significantly greater reduction in depression scores than placebo, with a mean difference of 6.1 points on the MADRS scale. Relapse rates dropped from 70.6% with placebo to 42.9% with 180 mg. No blood pressure changes occurred, and sedation or dissociation were minimal. Most dosing took place at home.
The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science
January 7, 2025
Natalie T Mills, Stevan Nikolin, Nick Glozier et al.
3 citations
Anxiety disorders and treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (TRD) often occur together. In a randomized controlled trial comparing subcutaneous ketamine to midazolam in 174 people with TRD, ketamine reduced anxiety only when given at flexible, response-guided doses (0.5-0.9 mg/kg). At a fixed low dose (0.5 mg/kg), the reduction in anxiety was not statistically significant. The anxiety-reducing effect was linked to overall depression improvement and was not sustained four weeks after treatment ended. The findings suggest that adequate dosing is necessary for ketamine's anxiolytic effect in this population.
Journal of affective disorders
October 15, 2025
Mary Lou Chatterton, Johana Kevin Perez, Thao Thai et al.
2 citations
Subcutaneous ketamine appears cost-effective for treatment-resistant depression from a health sector perspective when the costs of the control treatment (midazolam) are included, but not from a societal perspective. A cost-utility analysis alongside a randomized controlled trial with 174 participants compared ketamine to midazolam given twice weekly for four weeks. At the end of the trial, quality of life scores were significantly higher for ketamine. When control arm costs were included, ketamine was less costly and more effective, with an 89% probability of being cost-effective at a $50,000 per quality-adjusted life year threshold. Excluding those costs made ketamine not cost-effective, highlighting the importance of comparator choice.
The British Journal of Psychiatry
July 6, 2026
Nick Glozier, Richard W. Morris, Elizabeth Stratton et al.
A 4-week course of subcutaneous racemic ketamine produced short-term clinical benefit in a minority of people with treatment-resistant depression, with response rates declining substantially after treatment cessation. Among 130 participants, 30% responded at treatment end (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale reduction ≥50%), but only 17% remained responders 4 weeks later, and over 50% experienced less than a 25% reduction in depression scores. No difference in response was found between fixed and flexible dosing regimens. Prior ketamine treatment during an earlier randomized trial did not affect later outcomes. No suicides or suicidal behavior requiring admission occurred, and only expected side effects were observed.