Skip to content

Nick Neave

Northumbria University

1 paper in the library · publishing 2026

Papers

Mind over matter? The cognitive styles of scientific scepticism and paranormal belief

Frontiers in Psychology March 6, 2026 Neil Dagnall, Andrew Denovan, Claire Murphy-Morgan et al.

People who hold strong scientific beliefs tend to rely on analytical-rational thinking, while those who hold paranormal beliefs tend to rely on intuitive-experiential thinking. In a sample of 300 adults, traditional and New Age paranormal beliefs correlated positively with intuitive processing and negatively with analytical processing; belief in science showed the opposite pattern. Two subgroups emerged: Higher Evidence-based Thinking (55% of participants) with high scientific and low paranormal belief, and Lower Evidence-based Thinking (45%) with low scientific and high paranormal belief. Cognitive rigidity (dogmatism and need for closure) did not differ between groups, suggesting these traits are belief-neutral characteristics of strongly held convictions rather than specific to scientific or paranormal worldviews.