Skip to content

New psychoactive substances as adulterants of controlled drugs. A worrying phenomenon?

Claudio Vidal Giné, Iván Fornís Espinosa, Mireia Ventura Vilamala

Drug testing and analysis January 1, 2014 DOI: 10.1002/dta.1610 via PubMed

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

New psychoactive substances (NPS) are increasingly used as adulterants in controlled drugs, a phenomenon that has received little attention. Analysis of 173 samples submitted to a drug checking service from 2009 to 2012 identified 24 different NPS—including phenethylamines, substituted cathinones, tryptamines, and methoxetamine—in products believed to be MDMA, amphetamine, ketamine, cocaine, mescaline, or methamphetamine. The most common NPS adulterant was 2C-B, followed by 4-FA. Sixty-nine distinct substance combinations were found: 20 involved a controlled drug mixed with an NPS, and 49 involved one or more NPS replacing the intended drug entirely. These combinations pose substantial risks to users, highlighting the need for better knowledge of their toxicity and the dangers of NPS entering illegal markets. Drug checking services and early-warning systems can help reduce harm.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Observational study Peer reviewed
Sample size 173
Population Samples submitted to Energy Control's drug checking service believed to be MDMA, amphetamine, ketamine, cocaine, mescaline, or methamphetamine
Duration 2009 to 2012
Keywords Controlled drugs Illegal market New psychoactive substances Compounds Adulteration adulteration
Citations 135
Key finding From 2009 to 2012, 24 new psychoactive substances were identified as adulterants in 173 samples of controlled drugs, with 2C-B and 4-FA being the most common, and 69 different substance combinations detected.

Abstract

The use of new psychoactive substances (NPS) as adulterants has received little attention in the literature. In this paper, results from Energy Control's drug checking service documenting the use of NPS as adulterants of controlled drugs are presented, and some reflections about possible explanations for this new phenomenon, potential risks for users, and challenges that it poses are discussed. From 2009 to 2012, 24 NPS belonging to several chemical classes such as phenethylamines, substituted cathinones, tryptamines, and methoxetamine were identified in 173 samples believed to be MDMA, amphetamine, ketamine, cocaine, mescaline, or methamphetamine. The NPS adulterant most frequently observed was 2-(4-bromo-2,5-dimethoxyphenyl)ethanamine (2C-B) followed by 1-(4-fluorophenyl)propan-2-amine (4-FA). Sixty-nine different combinations of substances were detected: 20 involving a controlled drug combined with an NPS, and 49 involving one or more NPS that substituted the controlled drug. As these combinations could pose substantial risks to users, the need to improve knowledge about toxicity associated with these combinations, and the danger of these substances being incorporated into the products of illegal markets, are highlighted. Drug checking services and the European Union's early-warning system operated by the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) and Europol can play an important role in reducing the harm associated with this phenomenon.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment