2-(4-Iodo-2,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-N-[(2-methoxyphenyl)methyl]ethanamine (25I-NBOMe): clinical case with unique confirmatory testing.
Samuel J Stellpflug, Samantha E Kealey, Cullen B Hegarty, Gregory C Janis
Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology March 1, 2014 DOI: 10.1007/s13181-013-0314-y via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractA new, highly potent designer drug called 25I-NBOMe, part of the 2C family, caused an isolated brief seizure, rapid heart rate, high blood pressure, agitation, and confusion in an 18-year-old woman who used it. She recovered with intravenous fluids and benzodiazepines and was discharged seven hours after ingestion. Standard drug tests often miss these substances. Urine analysis using advanced techniques found 25I-NBOMe at 7.5 ng/mL and also detected 25H-NBOMe, a related compound. Further testing identified excreted metabolites, aiding future detection. This case highlights the dangers of evolving synthetic drugs and the need for specialized laboratory methods to confirm exposure.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Case study Case report Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 1 |
| Population | 18-year-old female who used 25I-NBOMe |
| Keywords | Designer drugs New psychoactive substances Nps Synthetic drugs Novel psychoactive substances |
| Citations | 92 |
| Key finding | 25I-NBOMe ingestion caused seizure, tachycardia, hypertension, agitation, and confusion; the drug was confirmed in urine at 7.5 ng/mL along with 25H-NBOMe. |
Abstract
2C designer drugs have been in use since the 1970s, but new drugs continue to develop from substitutions to the base phenethylamine structure. This creates new clinical profiles and difficulty with laboratory confirmation. 2-(4-Iodo-2,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-N-[(2-methoxyphenyl)methyl]ethanamine (25I-NBOMe) is a relatively new 2C drug that is more potent than structural 2C analogs; exposure reports are rare. Testing for 2C drugs is developing; specific testing for new analogs such as 25I-NBOMe is a challenge. These drugs do not reliably trigger a positive result on rapid drug immunoassays. Additionally, most facilities with confirmatory testing capabilities will not identify 25I-NBOMe; methods for detecting 25I-NBOMe in biological samples have not been clearly described nor have optimal metabolic targets for detecting 25I-NBOMe ingestion. An 18-year-old female presented following use of 25I-NBOMe. She had an isolated brief seizure, tachycardia, hypertension, agitation, and confusion. She improved with intravenously administered fluids and benzodiazepines and was discharged 7 h postingestion. Urine was analyzed using quantitative LC-MS/MS methodology for 25I-NBOMe, 2-(4-chloro-2,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-N-[(2-methoxyphenyl)-methyl]ethanamine (25C-NBOMe), and 2-(2,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-N-(2-methoxybenzyl)ethanamine (25H-NBOMe). 25I-NBOMe was found at a concentration of 7.5 ng/mL, and 25H-NBOMe was detected as well. Additional testing was pursued to characterize the metabolism of 25I-NBOMe; the sample was reanalyzed with UPLC-time-of-flight mass spectrometry to identify excreted metabolites. The sample was additionally analyzed for the presence of 2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenethylamine (2C-I), 4-bromo-2,5-dimethoxyphenethylamine (2C-B), and 1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-ethylphenyl)-2-aminoethane (2C-E). This is a report of a patient presenting following exposure to 25I-NBOMe, a dangerous member of the evolving 2C drug class. The exposure was confirmed in a unique manner that could prove helpful in guiding further patient analysis and laboratory studies.