Opposite effects of N,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT) and 5-methoxy-n,n-dimethyltryptamine (5-MeODMT) on acoustic startle: spinal vs brain sites of action.
Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews January 1, 1982 DOI: 10.1016/0149-7634(82)90034-3 via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractThe hallucinogens DMT and 5-MeODMT have opposite effects on the acoustic startle response in rats when given systemically: DMT depresses it while 5-MeODMT increases it. When injected directly into the brain, both drugs depress startle equally. When injected into the spinal cord, 5-MeODMT increases startle but DMT has no effect. Tests using electrical stimulation of a brainstem nucleus confirm that 5-MeODMT acts in the spinal cord to enhance startle, whereas DMT does not. The authors suggest that the differing behavioral effects of these drugs may depend on whether their action is primarily in the brain (where both are equally potent) or the spinal cord (where only 5-MeODMT is active).
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Experimental study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Population | Rat |
| Interventions | DMT 5-MeODMT 5-hydroxytryptamine |
| Citations | 25 |
| Key finding | DMT and 5-MeODMT are equally potent in depressing startle via brain actions, but only 5-MeODMT increases startle through spinal excitatory effects. |
Abstract
The present studies examined the role of the spinal cord and the brain in mediating the effects of the hallucinogens N,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT) and 5-methoxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamine (5-MeODMT) on the acoustic startle response in the rat. Systemic administration of these agents, which distributes to both the brain and spinal cord, produced opposite effects, as DMT depressed and 5-MeODMT increased acoustic startle. However, when administered directly into the lateral ventricle in the forebrain (intraventricular administration) 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), DMT and 5-MeODMT all depressed acoustic startle, DMT and 5-MeODMT being about equipotent in this regard. In contrast, when administered directly into the spinal cord subarachnoid space (intrathecal administration), 5-HT and 5-MeODMT increased startle, whereas DMT was without effect. In another series of studies, the effects of systemically-administered DMT and 5-MeODMT on the "startle" elicited by electrical stimulation of the nucleus reticularis pontis caudalis (RPC) were determined. Since the RPC is the last nucleus of the primary startle circuit before the spinal cord, agents which act downstream from the RPC (i.e., in the lower brainstem and spinal cord) would be expected to alter RPC-elicited "startle," while agents which act upstream from the RPC would be without effect. Given systemically, 5-MeODMT markedly increased RPC-elicited "startle" while DMT was without effect. These data indicate that DMT and 5-MeODMT are equipotent in depressing startle through actions in the brain. In contrast, the difference in the effects of DMT and 5-MeODMT on acoustic startle is related to the spinal excitatory effects of 5-MeODMT which DMT does not possess. From the present results it is suggested that the relative potencies of DMT and 5-MeODMT in other behavioral measures may relate to the role of brain (equipotent) or spinal (5-MeODMT more potent than DMT) sites of action for the various behaviors.