Skip to content

In the new era of psychedelic assisted therapy: A systematic review of study methodology in randomized controlled trials.

Paul S Soliman, Dallece E Curley, Christy Capone, Erica Eaton, Carolina L Haass-Koffler

Psychopharmacology June 1, 2024 DOI: 10.1007/s00213-024-06598-6 via PubMed

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

A systematic review of randomized placebo-controlled trials using psychedelics (MDMA, psilocybin, LSD, DMT/ayahuasca) with assisted therapy for psychiatric disorders found that traditional placebos are inadequate for controlling expectancy biases. Sixteen studies were reviewed. The authors suggest that active placebos and methods to limit personnel unblinding are important for future trial designs to improve internal validity and reduce response bias.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Systematic review Randomized Placebo-controlled Peer reviewed
Sample size 16
Population Randomized controlled trials of psychedelics for psychiatric disorders
Topics MDMA Psychedelic-assisted therapy
Keywords Assisted therapy Placebo Psychadelics
Citations 22
Key finding Traditional placebo administration is insufficient to control for expectancy confounds in psychedelic-assisted therapy trials; active placebos and methods to limit unblinding are important design considerations.

Abstract

Recent years have seen a resurgence in randomized, placebo controlled trials (RCTs) utilizing non-classical psychedelics (e.g. 3,4-methyl enedioxy methamphetamine [MDMA]), and classical psychedelics (e.g. psilocybin, lysergic acid diethylamide [LSD], and N,N-dimethyltryptamine [DMT/ayahuasca]) in conjunction with assisted therapy (AT) for psychiatric disorders. A notable methodological challenge in psychedelic AT, however, is the complexity of blinding procedures. The lack of efficacious blinding can introduce considerable response bias, reduce internal validity, and compromise participant retention. This systematic review examines design and blinding techniques in RCTs utilizing psychedelics and placebo for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. The aim of this work is to identify factors that may inform future RTC design for conducting psychedelics research. We conducted a systematic review of PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Psycinfo, Embase, and Web of Science Core Collection to examine: (1) placebo selection, (2) study design, and (3) integrity of blinding measures. Sixteen publications were identified as meeting the criteria for a systematic review. Our findings suggest that traditional placebo administration is insufficient to control for expectancy confounds. Consequently, experimental methodology that limits personnel unblinding and the use of an active placebo are important considerations when designing prospective clinical studies involving psychedelics.

Explore topics

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment