Skip to content

Natural Product Synthesis in the 21st Century: Beyond the Mountain Top

Ryan A. Shenvi

ACS Central Science February 14, 2024 DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.3c01518 via OpenAlex

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Natural product synthesis began from human curiosity about matter and its medicinal uses, yielding molecules like strychnine, morphine, psilocybin, and ephedrine. The field advanced organic chemistry by studying nonmetal elements but later contracted in the United States as pharmaceutical companies divested and academic focus shifted to catalysis and applications-driven research. Now, with widespread bioassays and chemical biology tools, synthesis gains new relevance. Digital encoding and data science can apply hard-won insights to new challenges, allowing chemists to surpass natural properties. The essay contextualizes natural product synthesis for a broad audience and anticipates a bright future at the intersection of synthesis and biology.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Essay Peer reviewed
Keywords Nanotechnology Natural product Chemistry Premise Biochemical engineering
Citations 37
Key finding Natural product synthesis, after a period of decline, is poised for a renaissance through integration with chemical biology, digital tools, and data science.

Abstract

Research into natural products emerged from humanity's curiosity about the nature of matter and its role in the materia medica of diverse civilizations. Plants and fungi, in particular, supplied materials that altered behavior, perception, and well-being profoundly. Many active principles remain well-known today: strychnine, morphine, psilocybin, ephedrine. The potential to circumvent the constraints of natural supply and explore the properties of these materials led to the field of natural product synthesis. This research delivered new molecules with new properties, but also led to fundamental insights into the chemistry of the nonmetal elements H, C, N, O, P, S, Se, and their combinations, i.e., organic chemistry. It also led to a potent culture focused on bigger molecules and races to the finish line, perhaps at the expense of actionable next steps. About 20 years ago, the field began to contract in the United States. Research that focused solely on chemical reaction development, especially catalysis, filled the void. After all, new reactions and mechanistic insight could be immediately implemented by the chemistry community, so it became hard to justify the lengthy procurement of a complex molecule that sat in the freezer unused. This shift coincided with a divestment of natural product portfolios by pharmaceutical companies and an emphasis in academic organic chemistry on applications-driven research, perhaps at the expense of more fundamental science. However, as bioassays and the tools of chemical biology become widespread, synthesis finds a new and powerful ally that allows us to better deliver on the premise of the field. And the hard-won insights of complex synthesis can be better encoded digitally, mined by data science, and applied to new challenges, as chemists perturb and even surpass the properties of complex natural products. The 21st century promises powerful developments, both in fundamental organic chemistry and at the interface of synthesis and biology, if the community of scientists fosters its growth. This essay tries to contextualize natural product synthesis for a broad audience, looks ahead to its transformation in the coming years, and expects the future to be bright.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment