Skip to content

EEG Lempel-Ziv complexity varies with sleep stage, but does not seem to track dream experience.

Arnfinn Aamodt, André Sevenius Nilsen, Rune Markhus, Anikó Kusztor, Fatemeh Hasanzadehmoghadam, Nils Kauppi, Benjamin Thürer, Johan Frederik Storm, Bjørn Erik Juel

Frontiers in human neuroscience January 1, 2022 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.987714 via PubMed

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

In a follow-up EEG sleep study, brain signal complexity (Lempel-Ziv complexity, LZC) decreased progressively from wakefulness into deeper non-REM sleep. However, within NREM2 sleep, there was no significant difference in LZC between dream and non-dream awakenings, and no correlation between LZC and subjective ratings of dream vividness, diversity, or perceptual quality. The authors failed to reproduce their earlier finding that posterior LZC increased with more perceptual dream experiences. This raises doubts about whether EEG LZC is a reliable marker of richness of experience within the same sleep stage.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Observational cohort Peer reviewed
Population Participants in evening sleep experiments after partial sleep deprivation
Intervention partial sleep deprivation
Topics Dreaming
Keywords EEG Complexity Consciousness Sleep
Citations 29
Key finding Within NREM2 sleep, EEG LZC did not differ between dream and non-dream awakenings and did not correlate with subjective dream ratings, failing to replicate a previous finding.

Abstract

In a recent electroencephalography (EEG) sleep study inspired by complexity theories of consciousness, we found that multi-channel signal diversity progressively decreased from wakefulness to slow wave sleep, but failed to find any significant difference between dreaming and non-dreaming awakenings within the same sleep stage (NREM2). However, we did find that multi-channel Lempel-Ziv complexity (LZC) measured over the posterior cortex increased with more perceptual ratings of NREM2 dream experience along a thought-perceptual axis. In this follow-up study, we re-tested our previous findings, using a slightly different approach. Partial sleep-deprivation was followed by evening sleep experiments, with repeated awakenings and immediate dream reports. Participants reported whether they had been dreaming, and were asked to rate how diverse, vivid, perceptual, and thought-like the contents of their dreams were. High density (64 channel) EEG was recorded throughout the experiment, and mean single-channel LZC was calculated for each 30 s sleep epoch. LZC progressively decreased with depth of non-REM sleep. Surprisingly, estimated marginal mean LZC was slightly higher for NREM1 than for wakefulness, but the difference did not remain significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons. We found no significant difference in LZC between dream and non-dream awakenings, nor any significant relationship between LZC and subjective ratings of dream experience, within the same sleep stage (NREM2). The failure to reproduce our own previous finding of a positive correlation between posterior LZC and more perceptual dream experiences, or to find any other correlation between brain signal complexity and subjective experience within NREM2 sleep, raises the question of whether EEG LZC is really a reliable correlate of richness of experience as such, within the same sleep stage.

Explore topics

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment