Disruption as an opportunity or threat: A qualitative analysis of factors influencing the attitudes of experts in serious illness care toward psychedelic-assisted therapies.

Experts in serious illness care and psychedelic-assisted therapy (PAT) hold divergent views on PAT's therapeutic potential and safety for patients with serious illness. Five factors shape their attitudes: perception of unmet need, knowledge of empirical studies, personal psychedelic experience, professional background, and age or generation. An overarching theme is PAT's disruptive potential at four levels: the patient's experience of self, illness, and death; relationships with loved ones and healthcare providers; existing clinical models; and societal attitudes toward death. Whether this disruption is seen as a therapeutic opportunity or an undue risk determines the level of support. These points of disruption raise practical and philosophical considerations for integrating PAT into serious illness care.

Study at a glance

Abstract

Psychedelic-assisted therapies (PAT) are emerging as a promising treatment for psycho-existential distress in patients with serious illness. A recent qualitative analysis of perspectives of 17 experts in serious illness care and/or PAT research identified divergent views on the therapeutic potential and safety of PAT in patients with serious illness. This paper further analyzes the factors that may influence these views. To identify factors underlying the attitudes of experts in serious illness care and/or PAT toward PAT and its potential role in serious illness care. Semi-structured interviews of 17 experts in serious illness care and/or PAT from the United States and Canada were analyzed to identify factors cited as influencing their views on PAT. Five factors were identified as influencing experts' attitudes toward PAT: perception of unmet need, knowledge of empirical studies of PAT, personal experience with psychedelics, professional background, and age/generation. In addition, an integrative theme emerged from the analysis, namely PAT's disruptive potential at 4 levels relevant to serious illness care: patient's experience of self, illness, and death; relationships with loved ones and health-care providers; existing clinical models of serious illness care; and societal attitudes toward death. Whether this disruptive potential was viewed as a therapeutic opportunity, or an undue risk, was central in influencing experts' level of support. Experts' perception of this disruptive potential was directly influenced by the 5 identified factors. Points of disruption potentially invoked by PAT in serious illness care highlight important practical and philosophical considerations when working to integrate PAT into serious illness care delivery in a safe and effective way.