Clinical Trial Design Challenges and Opportunities for Emerging Treatments for Opioid Use Disorder: A Review.

A review sponsored by a public-private partnership addresses clinical trial design for new opioid use disorder (OUD) treatments that target systems other than the μ-opioid receptor. The authors present consensus recommendations for evaluating novel therapies such as cannabinoids, psychedelics, sedative-hypnotics, and immunotherapeutics. Key design elements include specifying the treatment stage (e.g., early abstinence, long-term recovery), defining the treatment's role (adjunctive or independent), selecting patient-informed primary outcomes that assess opioid use patterns, retention, and quality of life, and monitoring adverse events like relapse or overdose, especially when patients are not on maintenance opioid agonist or antagonist medications. Incorporating input from people with lived experience is urged to accelerate development and uptake of effective therapeutics.

Study at a glance

Abstract

Novel treatments for opioid use disorder (OUD) are needed to address both the ongoing opioid epidemic and long-standing barriers to existing OUD treatments that target the endogenous μ-opioid receptor (MOR) system. The goal of this review is to highlight unique clinical trial design considerations for the study of emerging treatments for OUD that address targets beyond the MOR system. In November 2019, the Analgesic, Anesthetic, and Addiction Clinical Trial Translations, Innovations, Opportunities, and Networks (ACTTION) public-private partnership with the US Food and Drug Administration sponsored a meeting to discuss the current evidence regarding potential treatments for OUD, including cannabinoids, psychedelics, sedative-hypnotics, and immunotherapeutics, such as vaccines. Consensus recommendations are presented regarding the most critical elements of trial design for the evaluation of novel OUD treatments, such as: (1) stage of treatment that will be targeted (eg, seeking treatment, early abstinence/detoxification, long-term recovery); (2) role of treatment (adjunctive with or independent of existing OUD treatments); (3) primary outcomes informed by patient preferences that assess opioid use (including changes in patterns of use), treatment retention, and/or global functioning and quality of life; and (4) adverse events, including the potential for opioid-related relapse or overdose, especially if the patient is not simultaneously taking maintenance MOR agonist or antagonist medications. Applying the recommendations provided here as well as considering input from people with lived experience in the design phase will accelerate the development, translation, and uptake of effective and safe therapeutics for individuals struggling with OUD.