The Causal Role of Consciousness in Psychedelic Therapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression: Hypothesis and Proposal
Tobías Fernández‐borkel, Lucas F. Borkel, Jaime Rojas‐hernández, Elisa Hernández‐álvarez, Domingo Jesús Quintana Hernández, Lucia Ponti, Luis Alberto Henríquez‐hernández
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science July 16, 2025 DOI: 10.1021/acsptsci.5c00445 via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractA proposed randomized controlled trial aims to determine whether the subjective psychedelic experience caused by psilocybin is necessary for its antidepressant effects in treatment-resistant depression, or whether neurobiological actions alone suffice. The protocol compares three groups: psilocybin while conscious, psilocybin under propofol-induced general anesthesia (which eliminates subjective experience), and anesthesia with placebo. Clinical assessments and fMRI measures of brain connectivity will be collected. The authors hypothesize that the conscious psilocybin group will show superior improvements in depression and anxiety, and that increased brain fractal complexity and entropy will correlate with therapeutic gains. The results could clarify the causal role of conscious experience in psychedelic therapy.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Randomized controlled trial Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Population | Patients with treatment-resistant depression |
| Interventions | Psilocybin Propofol-induced general anesthesia |
| Dose | 25 mg |
| Keywords | Consciousness Depression economics Psychotherapist Clinical psychology Psychoanalysis |
| Citations | 3 |
| Key finding | The protocol hypothesizes that conscious psilocybin experiences produce superior antidepressant and anti-anxiety effects compared to psilocybin under anesthesia or anesthesia alone. |
Abstract
The therapeutic potential of psychedelic substances, particularly psilocybin, for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) has garnered considerable attention. However, the necessity of subjective psychedelic experiences for therapeutic efficacy remains unclear, creating a critical gap in the field. To determine whether subjective psychedelic experiences induced by psilocybin are required for its antidepressant effects or whether these effects are mediated solely by neurobiological actions independent of consciousness. We propose a randomized controlled trial with three groups: (P) Psilocybin (25 mg oral dose with guided therapeutic integration), (P+A) Psilocybin under propofol-induced general anesthesia (eliminating subjective experiences), and (X+A) Propofol-induced anesthesia with placebo (with no psilocybin). Clinical assessments of depression and anxiety, combined with fMRI-based brain connectivity analysis (including fractal complexity, brain entropy, and network dynamics), will be conducted at baseline, postintervention, and during follow-ups. The proposed study protocol expects distinct therapeutic outcomes across groups. Superior improvements in depression and anxiety symptoms are anticipated in the conscious psilocybin group (P) compared to both anesthetized groups (P+A) and (X+A). Additionally, increased brain connectivity measures in fractal complexity and entropy are hypothesized to correlate positively with therapeutic improvements, particularly pronounced in the conscious condition. Isolating subjective experiences through anesthesia, aims to determine whether conscious psychedelic experiences play a causal role in therapeutic outcomes. Results have significant implications for clinical protocols, treatment guidelines, and the broader theoretical understanding of consciousness and its relationship to mental health.