Skip to content

Prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing PROpofol versus KetaMINE in rapid sequence intubation in critically ill patients (PROMINE): protocol paper and statistical analysis plan.

Raysa Cristina Schmidt, Fernando Godinho Zampieri, Fernando Jose Da Silva Ramos, Felipe Santos Cavatoni Serra, Lucas Petri Damiani, Flávio Geraldo Rezende de Freitas, Flávia Ribeiro Machado

Critical care science January 1, 2025 DOI: 10.62675/2965-2774.20250133 via PubMed

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

The PROMINE study is a planned randomized trial comparing ketamine and propofol for rapid sequence intubation in critically ill patients. Propofol is commonly used but can worsen low blood pressure, whereas ketamine may be safer due to a more favorable effect on blood pressure. The study will randomly assign 170 critically ill patients needing a breathing tube in the intensive care unit to receive either ketamine or propofol. The main outcome is the occurrence of low blood pressure within the first 10 minutes after drug administration. The results aim to guide which hypnotic agent is safer for these vulnerable patients.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Randomized controlled trial Open-label Peer reviewed
Sample size 170
Population Critically ill patients requiring endotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit
Interventions Ketamine Propofol
Topics Ketamine
Keywords Intubation Breathing tube insertion Pharmacology Propofol
Citations 3
Key finding The PROMINE study will assess whether ketamine reduces the incidence of hypotension compared to propofol during rapid sequence intubation in critically ill patients.

Abstract

The optimal and safest hypnotic agent for rapid sequence intubation in critically ill patients remains uncertain. Factors such as hypovolemia, vasoplegia, hypoxemia, and acidosis can influence the efficacy and safety of induction agents. Propofol is commonly used for this purpose; however, it is associated with the risk of exacerbating hypotension. Ketamine, which has a more favorable hemodynamic profile, may offer a safer alternative in these patients. To assess whether ketamine is a safer alternative to propofol for rapid sequence intubation by reducing the incidence of hypotension during induction in critically ill patients. This will be a randomized, open-label, pragmatic, bicenter study. A total of 170 critically ill patients requiring endotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit will be randomly assigned to receive either ketamine or propofol as the hypnotic agent. Randomization will be conducted using RedCap with a 1:1 ratio and variable block sizes, stratified by study site and vasopressor use during intubation. The primary outcome will be the occurrence of hypotension, defined as the lowest mean arterial pressure recorded within the first 10 minutes following induction. Secondary outcomes, assessed within 1-hour post-induction, include mortality, incidence of cardiopulmonary arrest, the occurrence of severe hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 80mmHg), the occurrence of severe hypoxemia (oxygen saturation < 85%), and the number of intubation attempts. The PROMINE study will provide valuable evidence to guide the selection of hypnotic agents for rapid sequence intubation in critically ill patients. It will contribute to a better understanding of the hemodynamic effects associated with propofol and ketamine in this context, potentially informing clinical practice.

Explore topics

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment