Psychedelic philanthropy: The nonprofit sector and Timothy Leary's 1960s psychedelic movement
Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences February 1, 2021 DOI: 10.1002/jhbs.22083 via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractWealthy patrons and philanthropic attitudes provided crucial financial, legal, and logistical support for Timothy Leary's early research into LSD and psilocybin, as well as his subsequent psychedelic movement. Leary's shift from academic researcher to LSD guru during the 1960s was accompanied by changes in the patterns of this support. His legal troubles later in the decade are linked to the emerging movement to legalize cannabis. The paper also draws historical continuity to contemporary efforts to fund psychedelic research.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Historical analysis Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Topics | Psilocybin |
| Keywords | Movement music Sociology Political science Psychology |
| Citations | 2 |
| Key finding | Classic philanthropic attitudes and wealthy patrons played a major supporting role for Leary's psychedelic movement, with changes in support patterns accompanying his transition from academic to LSD guru. |
Abstract
Abstract Little has been written on the financial support behind Timothy Leary's unorthodox research into mind‐altering drugs like LSD and psilocybin and his subsequent psychedelic movement. Indeed several individuals and organizations helped the psychedelic cause by directly funding Leary's ventures, offering legal and logistic assistance, and organizing fund‐raising campaigns. I argue that classic philanthropic attitudes and wealthy patrons played a major supporting role for Leary's psychedelic movement in the first part of the decade and that the changes in Leary's research objectives and his transition from academic to LSD guru were accompanied by changes in the patterns of support that occurred throughout the 1960s. This paper also connects Leary's legal troubles in the second part of the decade with the rise of the movement to legalize cannabis and points to historical continuity by looking at contemporary endeavors to fund psychedelic research.