Trends in the Top-Cited Articles on Classic Psychedelics
Bhanu Sharma, David W. Lawrence, Roland R. Griffiths, Robin Carhart‐Harris
Journal of Psychoactive Drugs February 3, 2021 DOI: 10.1080/02791072.2021.1874573 via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractAn analysis of the top-cited classic psychedelic publications found that recent highly cited work (published after 2010) focuses more on clinical trials and therapeutic applications, especially for affective and substance use disorders, while older highly cited work was dominated by basic science and preclinical studies. Psilocybin was the primary substance in recent top-cited articles, whereas LSD was more common in older ones. The recent cohort also had a much higher annual citation rate. The field is moving from foundational pharmacological understanding toward identifying clinical uses.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Bibliometric analysis Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 76 |
| Population | Top-cited classic psychedelic publications |
| Topics | Psilocybin |
| Keywords | Cohort study Internal medicine Psychiatry |
| Citations | 37 |
| Key finding | Recent top-cited psychedelic publications are more likely to be clinical trials studying therapeutic uses for affective and substance use disorders, while older top-cited publications were predominantly basic science and preclinical studies. |
Abstract
This study was designed to identify trends in the top-cited classic psychedelic publications. The top 50 publications on classic psychedelics with the greatest total of number of citations and annual citation rate were identified and pooled. Unique articles (n = 76) were dichotomized by median year of publication (2010.5); the differential distribution of study characteristics between the "Recent Cohort" (n = 38) and "Older Cohort" (n = 38) were documented. The Recent Cohort had a greater annual citation rate (median 76.0, IQR 38.5 to 101.5) compared to the Older Cohort (median10.0, IQR 5.2 to 19.3, p n = 26 [68.4%] vs. n = 9 [23.7%]) while the Older Cohort included more basic science and preclinical studies (n = 21 [55.3%] vs. n = 2 [5.3%], p n = 25 [65.8%] vs. n = 9 [23.7%]) while lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) was predominantly studied in the Older Cohort (n = 25 [65.8%] vs. n = 18 [47.4%], p = .013). The Recent Cohort included more studies examining affective disorders (n = 15 [39.5%] vs. n = 3 [7.9%]) and substance use disorders (n = 6 [15.8%] vs. n = 0 [0.0%]), while the Older Cohort included a greater number of pharmacological outcomes (n = 29 [76.3%] vs. n = 6 [15.8%], p < .001). This study identified and documented trends in the top-cited classic psychedelic publications. The field is continuing to form a foundational understanding of the pharmacological effects of psychedelics and is now advancing with the identification of therapeutic uses within clinical populations.