The factor structure of the Mystical Experience Questionnaire (MEQ): Reply to Bouso et al., 2016.
Frederick S. Barrett, Roland R. Griffiths
Hum Psychopharmacol January 1, 2017 DOI: 10.1002/hup.2564 via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractThe factor structure of the Mystical Experience Questionnaire (MEQ) is defended against critiques by Bouso et al. (2016). The authors argue that the MEQ's multi-factor model, which captures dimensions such as ineffability and mystical encounter, remains a reliable and valid tool for measuring spiritual experiences. They contend that the proposed alternative structure does not better represent the underlying facets of mystical phenomena and that the original model demonstrates consistent psychometric properties across studies. The reply emphasizes the questionnaire's effectiveness in assessing deep spiritual phenomena and maintains that its current structure is supported by empirical evidence.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Reply or commentary Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Topics | Mystical experience |
| Keywords | Deep spiritual phenomena Mystical encounters Ineffable experiences Psychometrics Reliable measurement |
| Citations | 12 |
| Key finding | The Mystical Experience Questionnaire's multi-factor model is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring mystical experiences, and the critique by Bouso et al. does not undermine its psychometric properties. |
Abstract
The factor structure of the Mystical Experience Questionnaire (MEQ): Reply to Bouso et al., 2016.