Skip to content

Evidence for tolerance in psychedelic microdosing from the self-blinding microdose trial

Stefan Baumann, Robin Carhart-Harris, David Nutt, David Erritzøe, Balázs Szigeti

October 19, 2022 preprint DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/s4qhf via OpenAlex

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

In a placebo-controlled citizen science trial with 240 participants, microdosing tolerance was assessed by tracking whether correct guesses of receiving a microdose decreased with more doses taken. Correct guess probability declined overall, indicating tolerance developed. This tolerance was specific to LSD and LSD-analogue microdoses, not psilocybin microdoses. The findings suggest that microdosers may need to periodically suspend their routine to avoid tolerance and that psilocybin may be better suited for long-term protocols.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Placebo-controlled citizen science trial
Sample size 240
Population Citizen scientists self-blinded in a microdose trial
Intervention psilocybin
Topics Psilocybin
Keywords Microdose Blinding Placebo Medicine
Citations 2
Key finding Correct microdose guess probability decreased with number of microdoses taken overall, indicating tolerance, but this tolerance was present only with LSD/LSD-analogue microdoses, not psilocybin microdoses.

Abstract

Microdosing is the practice of regularly using very low doses of psychedelic drugs. Anecdotal reports suggest that it may enhance well-being, creativity and cognition. Here, we use data from a self-blinding microdose trial, a large (n=240) placebo-controlled citizen science trial of microdosing to investigate whether tolerance develops during microdosing. We conceptualized tolerance as the relationship between correct microdose guess probability and the number of previous microdoses taken within the trial’s timeframe: if tolerance develops then, correct microdose guess probability should decrease with more microdoses taken. Mixed linear regression models show that correct microdose guess probability decreases with number of microdoses taken (mean±se: -.017±.007; p=.009**), suggesting that tolerance developed. Secondary post-hoc analysis revealed that this tolerance was present with LSD/LSD-analogue microdoses (mean±se: -.026±.007; p<.001**), but not with psilocybin microdoses (mean±se: .013±.014; p=.36). These results suggest that microdosers may need to periodically suspend their microdosing routine to avoid tolerance and that psilocybin may be better suited for long-term microdosing protocols.

Explore topics

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment