Psilocybin lacks antidepressant-like effect in the Flinders Sensitive Line rat
Oskar Hougaard Jefsen, Kristoffer Højgaard, Sofie Laage Christiansen, Betina Elfving, David Nutt, Gregers Wegener, Heidi Kaastrup Müller
Acta Neuropsychiatrica May 20, 2019 DOI: 10.1017/neu.2019.15 via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractPsilocybin, a serotonin receptor agonist being studied for treatment-resistant depression, showed no antidepressant-like effect in a rat model of depression. In Flinders Sensitive Line rats, which model depression, neither psilocybin nor its active form psilocin reduced immobility time in the forced swim test, a standard measure of antidepressant activity. The drugs also did not alter locomotor activity in an open field test, ruling out stimulant effects. The rats bred to be depression-prone did show more immobility than their control counterparts, confirming the model's validity. The findings suggest that different animal models and behavioral tests may better translate the positive effects of psilocybin observed in humans.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Experimental study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Population | Flinders Sensitive Line rats and Flinders Resistant Line rats |
| Interventions | Psilocybin psilocin |
| Topics | Depression Psilocybin Serotonin |
| Keywords | Antidepressant Open field Hallucinogen Pharmacology |
| Citations | 66 |
| Key finding | Psilocin and psilocybin showed no antidepressant-like effect in the forced swim test using Flinders Sensitive Line rats, despite positive effects in humans. |
Abstract
Abstract Objective: Psilocybin is a serotonin receptor agonist with a therapeutic potential for treatment-resistant depression and other psychiatric illnesses. We investigated whether the administration of psilocybin had an antidepressant-like effect in a rat model of depression. Methods: Using the Flinders Sensitive Line (FSL) rat model of depression, we assessed the antidepressant-like effect of psilocin and psilocybin, measured as a reduction in immobility time in the forced swim test (FST). We measured locomotor activity in an open field test (OFT) to control for stimulant properties of the drugs. We performed a set of experiments to test different doses, treatment paradigms, and timing of the tests in relation to the drug administration. Results: Psilocin and psilocybin showed no effect on immobility, struggling, or swimming behaviour in the FST and no effect on locomotor activity in the OFT. FSL rats did show significantly more immobility than their control strain, the Flinders Resistant Line, as expected. Conclusion: Psilocin and psilocybin showed no antidepressant-like effect in the FSL rats, despite a positive effect in humans. This suggests that other animal models of depression and other behavioural tests may be more appropriate for translational studies in the effects of psilocybin.