The Role and Ethics of Touch and Non-touch in Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy.
Helena D Aicher, Anke Röskamp, Marianne Moser, Manuela Brand
Current topics in behavioral neurosciences November 22, 2025 DOI: 10.1007/7854_2025_608 via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractTouch has long been central to human communication and healing, but in psychedelic-assisted therapy it raises complex ethical and practical challenges due to patients' heightened vulnerability. Recent reports of boundary violations have sharpened the debate. From a harm reduction perspective, the chapter acknowledges risks and the need for clear boundaries, transparency, informed consent, and cultural sensitivity, while arguing that touch can offer grounding, emotional support, and therapeutic value when used responsibly. Both touch and non-touch interventions are explored, including historical roots and therapeutic potentials, with ethical frameworks outlined to support safe, ethical, and effective practices.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Topics | Psychedelic-assisted therapy |
| Keywords | Body-oriented psychotherapy Harm reduction Transgressions Psychedelic touch therapy |
| Citations | 4 |
| Key finding | Touch in psychedelic-assisted therapy can offer grounding and therapeutic value when used with clear boundaries, informed consent, and cultural sensitivity, but requires careful ethical frameworks to mitigate risks of misuse and abuse. |
Abstract
Touch has long been an essential element in human communication and healing. In the field of psychedelic-assisted therapy (PAT), the role of touch (and by extension, non-touch) presents complex ethical and practical challenges, particularly due to the heightened vulnerability of individuals in altered states of consciousness. Recent public discourse, including reports of boundary violations and abuse, has sharpened the political and ethical discussion around physical contact in PAT settings.This chapter approaches the topic from a harm reduction perspective, acknowledging the risks of misuse and the need for clear boundaries, transparency, informed consent, and cultural sensitivity. At the same time, we argue that touch can offer grounding, emotional support, and therapeutic value when used with care and responsibly. We explore both touch and non-touch interventions in PAT, examining their historical roots, therapeutic potentials, and outlining the ethical frameworks necessary to navigate this complex and sensitive terrain. Our aim is to contribute to an informed and nuanced dialogue on the topic, which supports safe, ethical, and effective therapeutic practices.