Entheogens and the Public Mystery: The Rhetoric of R. Gordon Wasson
Configurations March 1, 2008 DOI: 10.1353/con.0.0050 via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractR. Gordon Wasson, who documented the use of psilocybin mushrooms among indigenous people in Mexico, employed a two-part strategy in his writings on psychedelics. He first worked to open scientific research beyond institutional boundaries, creating deinstitutionalized knowledge networks. Recognizing that such openness makes knowledge communities vulnerable to exploitation, he then drew on ancient mystery cults, especially the Greek Eleusinian Mysteries, to establish protective silences within these open networks. This interplay of openness and mystery offers a model for thinking about information flows that can enrich current intellectual property debates.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Openness to experience Rhetoric Indigenous Order exchange Epistemology |
| Citations | 11 |
| Key finding | Wasson's work on psychedelics combined openness in scientific knowledge networks with protective silences drawn from ancient mystery cults, offering an alternative framework for intellectual property debates. |
Abstract
This article explores the work of R. Gordon Wasson, who discovered the use of psilocybin mushrooms among indigenous people in Mexico. I argue that Wasson's writings on these and other psychedelic substances involve two primary moves. First, Wasson seeks to open up processes of scientific research beyond institutional and disciplinary boundaries, thereby constructing deinstitutionalized knowledge networks. At the same time, he recognizes that such openness leaves knowledge-making communities vulnerable to exploitation. Wasson's second move, then, is to draw on the tradition of the ancient mystery cults—particularly the Greek mysteries at Eleusis—in order to install protective silences within the open networks. This twofold structure of openness and mystery provides an alternative for thinking about and entering into information flows that can complicate and enrich current debates on intellectual property.