Microdosing as a response to the meaning crisis
Rotem Petranker, Juensung J. Kim, Thomas Anderson
May 26, 2020 preprint DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/2jnkf via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractPeople who microdose psychedelics like LSD or magic mushrooms do so mainly for clinical reasons and to boost productivity, but often struggle with unknown optimal dosing. Outcomes vary widely, from strong endorsement to disappointment at no effect. The analysis of 118 survey responses identified four themes: reasons, practice, outcomes, and meta-commentary, which included warnings against overexcitement. The findings suggest that even low doses may provide a sense of meaning lacking in Western culture, likely through enhanced psychological flexibility and connectedness, though placebo-controlled experiments are needed to confirm.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Qualitative study Placebo-controlled Double-blind |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 118 |
| Population | Individuals who reported microdosing at least once in the past year |
| Dose | sub-hallucinogenic amounts |
| Keywords | Meaning existential Microdose Disappointment Medicine Pharmacology |
| Citations | 4 |
| Key finding | Microdosing outcomes range from strong endorsement to disappointment, with participants microdosing mainly for clinical reasons and productivity, while struggling with unknown optimal dosing regimens. |
Abstract
Background: The use of psychedelic substances like LSD and magic mushrooms in research and to treat mental health conditions has been increasing in the last decade. In particular, the practice of microdosing – using sub-hallucinogenic amounts of psychedelics – has been increasing (Anderson et al., 2019), but large-scale systemic qualitative analyses are still scant.Aims: This study attempted to recognize emergent themes in qualitative reports regarding the experience of microdosing so as to enrich the theoretical landscape in psychedelics research and propose future research directions for both basic and clinical research.Methods: This study used qualitative analysis to analyze free-text responses from individuals who participated in an online survey disseminated on various social media platforms. Participants had reported microdosing at least once in the past year.Results: Data from 118 informative responses suggested four main emergent themes: reasons for microdosing, the practice of microdosing, outcomes linked to microdosing, and meta-commentary about microdosing. Participants mostly reported microdosing for clinical reasons and to improve productivity, and mentioned that the practice is often challenging due to unknown optimal dosing regimen. The outcomes of microdosing varied widely between strong endorsement of the practice and disappointment at the lack of effect. Meta-commentary included warning against overexcitement with the practice. We couch our findings in meaning-making theory and propose that, even at low doses, psychedelic substances can provide a sense of meaning currently lacking in Western culture.Conclusion: Our results suggest that there many of the reported benefits occur regardless of motivation to microdose and are likely due to the enhanced psychological flexibility and sense of connectedness made possible due to the use of psychedelics. Double-blind, placebo controlled experiments are required in order to substantiate these reports.