Psilocybin reporting in media (PRiMe) for the treatment of depression
Gurjot Brar, T. R. Jun. Burke, Andrew Gribben, Colm Harrington, Guillaume Thuery, John R. Kelly
Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine December 18, 2025 DOI: 10.1017/ipm.2025.10142 via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractOnline news coverage of psilocybin as a depression treatment increased sharply after 2022, with 43.2% of articles published between 2022 and 2024, mostly from US outlets. Although 90.4% of articles cited researchers, only 47.2% addressed risks, 46.4% discussed long-term evidence, and 25% included patient perspectives. Sentiment was very positive, averaging 2.27 on a −5 to +5 scale, and did not change significantly over time. Reporting on psilocybin's onset and duration of effects improved, but coverage remains concentrated in prominent outlets and lacks balance on risks and patient experiences.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Content analysis Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 125 |
| Population | English-language online news articles from top 30 global anglophone outlets |
| Duration | January 2000 to May 2024 |
| Topics | Psilocybin |
| Keywords | Foundation evidence Perception Depression economics Medline |
| Key finding | Media coverage of psilocybin for depression is very positive and increasing, but underrepresents risks, long-term evidence, and patient perspectives. |
Abstract
Abstract Objectives: Interest in psilocybin as a treatment for depression has risen over the past decade, fuelled by promising clinical trials and a rapidly evolving regulatory landscape. Media coverage plays a critical role in shaping public perceptions, yet little is known about how psilocybin is portrayed in global anglophone online news for the treatment of depression. Methods: This study examines the comprehensiveness and sentiment of English-language online news articles ( n = 125) discussing psilocybin as a treatment for depression from January 2000 to May 2024. Articles were sourced from the top 30 global anglophone news outlets, assessed using a 13-item instrument for comprehensiveness, and analysed for sentiment across five thematic categories. A separate sub-analysis was completed for Irish media. Results: Findings indicate a significant increase in coverage over time, with 43.2% of articles published between 2022 and 2024, predominantly from the USA (68%). While 90.4% of articles cited researchers, fewer addressed risks (47.2%), long-term evidence (46.4%), or patient perspectives (25%). Sentiment analysis revealed a very positive sentiment across articles which was 2.27 on a scale from −5 (most negative) to + 5 (most positive) (SD 1.33), with no significant changes over the time period. Reporting on psilocybin’s onset and duration of effects increased significantly, reflecting growing clinical evidence. However, coverage remains concentrated in prominent outlets, with limited attention to patient experiences and long-term safety. Conclusions: These findings highlight the media’s role in shaping discourse on emerging treatments and suggest a need for more balanced reporting to align public understanding with scientific evidence. This study provides a foundation for future research on media portrayals of psilocybin and implications for public perception and policy.