Use of Esketamine Nasal Spray in Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression in Routine Practice: A Real-World French Study.
Ludovic Samalin, Lila Mekaoui, Maud Rothärmel, Anne Sauvaget, Clotilde Wicart, Julien Dupin, Vanessa Cohignac, Émeline Gaudré-Wattinne
Depression and anxiety January 1, 2024 DOI: 10.1155/2024/7262794 via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractIn a French real-world study of 157 patients with treatment-resistant depression who began esketamine nasal spray, most discontinued treatment within about 19 weeks. After one month, 40% of those still on the drug showed clinical response and 20% achieved remission. Adverse events occurred in 69% of patients, with serious events in 17%. The findings align with earlier clinical trials, confirming esketamine's role in treating treatment-resistant depression.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Observational cohort Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 157 |
| Population | French patients aged 65 or younger with treatment-resistant depression |
| Intervention | Esketamine nasal spray |
| Duration | 12-month follow-up |
| Topics | Depression |
| Keywords | Mental health Ketamine therapy Medical breakthrough |
| Citations | 16 |
| Key finding | Esketamine nasal spray showed real-world effectiveness and safety consistent with previous trials, with 40% response and 20% remission at one month, but 80% discontinued treatment over 12 months. |
Abstract
The efficacy and safety of esketamine nasal spray (ESK) were established in registration trials in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). This French real-world study aimed to describe the treatment patterns, effectiveness, and safety of ESK in TRD patients over a 12-month follow-up. This study used secondary data from patient files of hospital-based psychiatrists and started during the first French patient early access to ESK. The response and remission rates with ESK were analyzed using the total score of the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). The time to first treatment response and work resumption were described (Kaplan-Meier method). Adverse events (AEs) were analyzed. Prior to ESK initiation, the 157 analyzed patients (age ≤ 65 years, 82.8%; female, 66.2%) had depression for 10.5 years (median, IQR, 4.2-21.2) and received a median of 6 (3-8) previous treatment lines. At ESK initiation, the mean ± SD total MADRS score was 32.1 ± 7.7. At that time, ESK was combined with antidepressants (93.6% of patients; SNRI, 65.0%; SSRI, 57.3%) and/or other potentiation strategy (63.1%; atypical antipsychotics, 36.3%; lithium, 25.6%; antiepileptics, 21.7%). During the 12-month follow-up, 125 patients (79.6%) discontinued ESK. The median duration of ESK treatment was 19.4 weeks (IQR, 4.4-40.1). At 1 month after ESK initiation, 40.2% of still treated patients met criteria for clinical response and 19.7% for remission (median time to response, 5.7 weeks; 95% CI (4.1-8.4)). 82.6% of active patients were on sick leave at ESK initiation; the work resumption rate was 24% (13%-40%) 12 weeks later. AEs were reported in 68.6% of patients, serious AEs in 17.2%, and AEs leading to ESK discontinuation in 14.6%. These real-world effectiveness and safety data were consistent with findings from previous clinical trials, describing the real-life clinical experience of patients receiving ESK and confirming that ESK has its place in therapy for the treatment of TRD.